The core issue in this space isn't rocket science—it's the incentive structures themselves. From established protocols like metadao to emerging platforms, the reality is stark: current reward mechanisms essentially attract illicit actors. The problem runs deep across the board, affecting even supposedly safer platforms. When economic incentives misalign with security, you're basically rolling out a welcome mat for criminals. It's a systemic flaw that deserves serious conversation.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
StablecoinArbitrageurvip
· 9h ago
honestly this is just the correlation coefficient between bad incentives and criminal activity hitting 0.99 lol. i've been backtesting reward mechanism designs (n=5000 simulations) and the sharpe ratio on "legitimate user" returns is absolutely gutted. metadao included.
Reply0
HashRateHermitvip
· 9h ago
Basically, it's just a lousy incentive mechanism, attracting a swarm of bad actors.
View OriginalReply0
BagHolderTillRetirevip
· 9h ago
Basically, it's a lousy incentive mechanism that invites trouble into the house.
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunter_9000vip
· 9h ago
To be honest, the incentive mechanism was a failure and there's no way to save it.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)