Recently reviewed Walrus's official 2026 Q1 priority plan, and the three directions are quite candidly outlined: XL blobs support, native blob management API, and USD-pegged storage pricing. On the surface, they seem different, but in reality, they all point to a core question—how to make enterprise users enjoy using it and keep accounting clear.



First, let's talk about XL blobs expansion. Currently, the limit for a single blob is capped at 13.3GB, which is a bit tight for large files like high-definition video libraries or AI training data. Once support reaches the TB level, migrating content libraries like Unchained will be much smoother. However, the technical challenges are also evident—erasure code calculations for ultra-large files will significantly increase, and finding the balance between performance and cost is a real challenge.

The USD-pegged pricing is the most interesting part. Currently, storage costs are directly priced in WAL tokens, so if the token price drops 11% in a day, the storage cost fluctuates by 11%. For enterprise finance departments, this is a nightmare for budgeting. If it switches to USD-pegged pricing—say, a fixed $10 per TB per month, with the protocol backend automatically converting to WAL for settlement—then enterprises will have more confidence in cost management. This approach directly benchmarks against AWS S3's pricing model, lowering the psychological barrier for Web2 companies to switch over.

The value of native APIs is often underestimated. Currently, integrating Walrus requires developers to package underlying calls themselves, which demands some technical skill. If the official provides SDKs and standard RESTful interfaces, ordinary backend engineers can get started quickly. This is crucial for expanding the developer base—most programmers are not excited about blockchain, so you must let them connect using the most familiar methods.

Beyond these specific items for Q1, the plan for the entire 2026 year emphasizes deep collaboration within the Sui ecosystem and enterprise compliance (like GDPR). The former aims to solidify its moat on Sui, while the latter directly determines whether it can open the door to the European and American enterprise markets.

That said, no matter how beautiful the roadmap looks, execution is what ultimately matters. Currently, the daily transaction volume is 691 transactions, and the protocol revenue in 24 hours is only $19. There’s still a significant gap between this and the ambition. The token price is at $0.1399, with a total market cap of $220 million. From this valuation, the time cost is still ample, allowing for a gradual realization of these promises.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
Bolang21vip
· 9h ago
please give 1$ usdt, uid 47366670
Reply0
OnlyOnMainnetvip
· 9h ago
The step of pegging to the US dollar indeed needs to be taken, otherwise corporate CFOs won't be able to meet their responsibilities. --- Honestly, the daily trading volume is only 691 transactions... this number is a bit heartbreaking. --- Developing native APIs is truly about gaining a foothold; right now, the threshold is indeed too high. --- From 13.3GB to TB level, the technical debt is piling up quite rapidly. --- Whether compliance can truly be achieved is the key to entering the European and American markets. --- With a valuation of $0.1399, there is indeed room for storytelling. --- On the day WAL coin price plummeted, I guess many corporate users directly canceled orders. --- The roadmap looks good, but execution... raises a question mark. --- This approach is about leaning towards S3, a good idea but easy to stumble into pitfalls. --- Having ample time cost is another way of saying it, meaning it can't be rushed.
View OriginalReply0
GhostWalletSleuthvip
· 9h ago
That's quite realistic. The fact that the USD peg hits a nerve—when the token price drops by 11%, corporate costs also shake—who can stand that? Being able to transfer the risk of token price volatility to the protocol layer for self-digestion is truly the right way to please enterprises. However, 691 daily trading volume... is a bit awkward. Compared to a market cap of 220 million, this gap is really painful. Simplifying the API is the right move. Most engineers don't care about chain-layer logic; they prefer familiar RESTful APIs. Supporting TB-level files sounds great, but it all depends on whether erasure coding optimization can truly keep up. Otherwise, it's just a paper promise. As for GDPR, if it can really pass, opening up the European market will be a real profit. Execution is the key; no one believes in empty promises anymore.
View OriginalReply0
TopBuyerBottomSellervip
· 9h ago
Haha, I have to admit, that move of pegging to the US dollar is pretty ruthless. My own coin's price dropped 11%, and I lost my composure; as for corporate finances, let alone, I would just call the police. I'm just worried that in the end, it will all be just talk. But on the other hand, this data of 691 trades per day... is really a bit amateurish. Giving myself some time is also good, no need to rush.
View OriginalReply0
EyeOfTheTokenStormvip
· 9h ago
The USD peg strategy indeed hits the pain point of corporate users, but frankly, it still compensates for the inherent volatility flaw of the token itself... An 11% daily decline, this is the real issue Walrus needs to address. From a quantitative perspective, 691 daily transactions combined with $19 revenue indicates that this data structure is still in the early exploration stage. However, the $220 million market cap valuation indeed leaves ample room for growth. If API and TB-level support truly materialize, there may be an opportunity for a valuation reshaping—provided that execution does not falter. A good-looking roadmap doesn't equate to completion; it depends on the actual demand within the Sui ecosystem. Honestly, there's still time now, but the risk of doing a T at the price of 0.1399 is a bit high. It's recommended to observe the Q1 execution before taking action.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerAirdropvip
· 9h ago
I like the move of pegging to the US dollar. Finally, someone understands the pain points of corporate finance. A 11% fluctuation in coin prices can really discourage many traditional companies. With only 691 daily transactions, daring to plan for TB-level blobs is a bit of a gamble. The API part is the key. Programmers don't care if you're blockchain or something else; just make it simple and easy to use. The valuation of 0.1399 still has room to grow. Let's see if it can really be achieved by 2026. Sui ecosystem collaboration sounds good, but I'm worried it might end up being just talk.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoSourGrapevip
· 10h ago
Sigh... I wish I had seen the USD-pegged pricing plan earlier. It feels a bit late to buy now.
View OriginalReply0
FomoAnxietyvip
· 10h ago
Anchoring to the US dollar indeed solved the pain points for enterprises, but how can a daily income of $19 support these technological investments? It feels like it will take a long time. By the way, can the computational costs of this erasure coding be really reduced? I didn't quite understand the technical details. Directly integrating the SDK makes it much more developer-friendly, which is the right approach. However, this valuation is indeed generous. With enough time, the only concern is whether the execution can keep up with the plan. How is the moat of the Sui ecosystem doing? Actually, this is the key part.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)