The development roadmap of Walrus is being tightly driven by the hot narratives in the crypto market.



This is very evident: when AI is in the spotlight, resources flood into the AI storage track; when RWA becomes the focus, teams rush to release related progress to maintain the hype. It seems flexible, but in reality, it’s passive follow-up. To raise funds and maintain valuation, project teams are forced to package complex milestones in their technical roadmaps into the "story versions" that the market currently wants to hear.

Doing this long-term leads to problems. Technical development becomes fragmented—working on one part this year, switching to another next year—lacking coherent internal logic. Once the narrative trend shifts—and in the crypto market, this is the norm—community expectations become chaotic, and resources are wasted accordingly.

Top-tier protocols should do the opposite. They should have a clear technical vision and then guide the market on how to understand themselves, rather than being led by market trends. This is the resilience needed to navigate cycles.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
just_here_for_vibesvip
· 21h ago
That hits too close to home. Walrus's approach is a typical "kite chasing" game—today AI, tomorrow RWA. It looks flexible but is actually just a bottomless dance of financing. Truly capable projects don't need to go through all this trouble. The problem is that most projects in the ecosystem are just putting on this show.
View OriginalReply0
EthSandwichHerovip
· 21h ago
To be honest, I'm tired of the Walrus routine, jumping on hot trends to package a roadmap, just a means of fundraising. Following the AI trend by focusing on AI storage, then RWA comes along and they tell RWA stories. The technical roadmap is hijacked by narratives, and in the end, development becomes fragmented and ends in failure.
View OriginalReply0
RatioHuntervip
· 21h ago
It's the same old story, following the trend of narrative packaging techniques, and in the end, nothing was accomplished.
View OriginalReply0
MindsetExpandervip
· 21h ago
This is a typical case of "I can tell stories" but "there's no story," with the fundraising tactics written out so clearly it's almost embarrassing.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeNightmarevip
· 21h ago
This is a typical valuation dilemma. Under financing pressure, the roadmap has become a storytelling tool... No wonder the community is so chaotic.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)