2026-01-19 19:39:33

An interesting scene: 5 wallets recently swept in $SIXAMO tokens on Solana. The project currently has a market cap of only $238K, with a token price of $0.00024, down 7% in 24 hours. However, trading volume is quite active — 24-hour transactions amount to $512K, which is 2.1 times the market cap. Among them, buy orders of $365K clearly outweigh sell orders of $147K, indicating a net capital inflow.

It is worth noting that the liquidity pool is only $23K, about 10% of the market cap. This thin liquidity combined with net buying suggests a quiet accumulation. But the risk is also significant — with such thin liquidity, price fluctuations can be very intense. It is recommended to monitor subsequent capital movements, as small-cap Solana tokens like this can easily experience slippage issues if liquidity deteriorates.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

AirdropBuffet

· 9h ago

5 wallets quietly accumulating, this rhythm feels a bit off --- Low liquidity + net buying, I've seen this trick too many times --- 238K market cap and daring to play, quite bold --- Slippage hell is waiting, be careful not to get trapped --- Funds inflow looks promising, but the liquidity is truly exceptional --- It's that kind of thing that skyrockets with a pull and crashes with a drop --- A 7% decline is actually a signal? That's interesting --- Buy orders outweigh sell orders, but liquidity is only 23K... how do you play this --- I'll just watch, not making a move, this pit is too deep --- I've seen many projects like this on Solana, nine out of ten are just to scam

View OriginalReply0

TokenUnlocker

· 9h ago

Minimal net liquidity inflow, I've seen this trick many times before. Is this another setup to trap small retail investors?

View OriginalReply0

tx_pending_forever

· 9h ago

It's that kind of low-liquidity small-cap play again, really need to be careful. I just want to ask, could the project team be in these 5 wallets? It looks like they're accumulating, but the liquidity is really too poor. Once the slippage gets out of control, it's game over. I always stay away from this kind of thing. Fund inflow ≠ guaranteed profit, brother. Don't be fooled.

View OriginalReply0

BloodInStreets

· 9h ago

Thin liquidity combined with crazy net inflows, isn't this just setting a trap for retail investors... It hurts to watch

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketGardener

· 9h ago

Thin liquidity + net buying, I’m too familiar with this trick, waiting to be dumped on --- Five wallets are so arrogant? I bet they are all connected --- Liquidity is only 23K, this isn’t accumulation, it’s gambling --- It’s the same small-cap coin trick again, slippage can eat up half your profit --- A 7% drop in 24 hours and they still dare to sweep? Either big players or bagholders --- I just want to know if these 5 wallets are just aliases of the same group of people --- Trading volume is more than twice the market cap, something’s fishy --- Waiting to see when this project’s liquidity will explode --- Small-cap Solana coins fear this kind of situation the most, stay far away

View OriginalReply0

AirdropFreedom