2026-01-19 19:28:45

It's kind of funny how the same talking points keep resurfacing whenever you question altcoin development practices. The unstated premise? Bitcoin devs get a free pass because they're somehow the moral custodians of the space—and good luck arguing otherwise.

Think about the logic here. Bitcoin developers are treated as infallible by definition, so their choices (or lack thereof) are automatically justified. Inaction becomes a virtue. Silence becomes wisdom. It's circular reasoning dressed up as principle.

Meanwhile, altcoin teams face scrutiny on steroids. Different rulebook entirely. The double standard isn't even hidden anymore—it's baked into how the community evaluates decision-making across projects.

The rhetorical move is slick though. Anytime you push back, the response is predetermined: "Well, Bitcoin devs operate differently because they're Bitcoin." Which tells you nothing about whether that difference actually matters or whether it's just narrative convenience.

Worth asking: who decided Bitcoin developers get to set the moral compass for the entire ecosystem? And more importantly, does that framework actually hold up under scrutiny, or is it just tribal loyalty masquerading as principle?

BTC-1,04%

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

InfraVibes

· 1h ago

This double standard phenomenon is really outrageous. BTC enthusiasts only resort to the excuse "Bitcoin is just different"... --- Alright, alright, are we starting with the "BTC developer moral high ground" again? I'm tired of hearing it. --- Wait, why is BTC's silence called wisdom, but other projects are called inaction? What's the standard? --- NGL, I've seen this circular reasoning a hundred times, but I just can't understand why. --- The community has been tamed so thoroughly that whatever is said is accepted as truth, and they don't even bother to scrutinize. --- Handing over the ecological moral hostage to a certain group of people— isn't that nonsense? --- Interestingly, raising doubts is seen as being different, and the discourse power has long been allocated.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoPhoenix

· 9h ago

Here is the translation: Once again, the same rhetoric. BTC believers will always have a reason [laugh-cry] --- Double standards have long been rotten in the community, but no one dares to speak out. --- Basically, it's still faith hijacking. When asked, it's "this is BTC's philosophy," what can you do? --- Wait, if we trace this logic back... who truly determines the discourse power? --- Silence ≈ wisdom, inaction ≈ principle. This set of rhetoric is indeed perfect. --- After going through cycles for so long, I finally understand that tribalism is the most valuable. --- BTC can be called conservative if it doesn't update, but altcoins not updating means they lack strength. Truly ironic. --- This kind of circular reasoning is like self-PUA in a bear market. It sounds convincing but actually says nothing. --- The bottom range is occupied by this kind of rhetoric. No wonder many projects can't develop. --- Human nature... Faith-based things will always win. This insight is quite piercing.

View OriginalReply0

CascadingDipBuyer

· 9h ago

ngl this is a classic double standard, BTC guys can win just by lying down

View OriginalReply0

SerLiquidated

· 9h ago

Laughing out loud, Bitcoin is the sacred cow of the community, everything it does is right. Altcoins just move slightly and get criticized to death. This double standard is truly amazing.

View OriginalReply0

HappyMinerUncle

· 9h ago

Honestly, I'm really tired of the BTC fans' rhetoric. Why is it that BTC does nothing and it's considered philosophy, while altcoin innovation gets criticized?

View OriginalReply0

ValidatorViking

· 9h ago

ngl the Bitcoin moral superiority thing is just another form of slashing risk nobody talks about. community consensus finality broken by tribal gatekeeping, same pattern every cycle.

Reply0