Public chain competition is so fierce, but honestly, there are not many projects that truly solve problems. I see that many chains still have overly complicated transfer processes — newcomers have to first stock up on Gas fees, which discourages many people from entering.
Recently, I came across an interesting idea: some projects directly target the "stablecoin payment" need by launching a zero-fee USDT transfer mechanism. Coupled with native ecosystem token empowerment design, they make the payment experience very smooth. The brilliance of this approach is that it’s not about piling up features, but truly addressing the pain points of large-scale applications — allowing ordinary users to enjoy the convenience of Web3 without worrying about Gas costs.
More importantly, these projects are usually backed by major institutions like Tether and Bitfinex, which means they have real stablecoin infrastructure and payment channels support. Not many public chains can connect to debit card consumption scenarios, so this can be seen as a relatively clear path to commercialization. As competition among public chains becomes increasingly homogeneous, focusing on solving actual payment needs has a long-term potential that’s quite promising.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
18 Likes
Reward
18
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GweiTooHigh
· 10h ago
Zero-fee transfers sound great, but will Tether really give such a big discount?
View OriginalReply0
quiet_lurker
· 10h ago
Zero fee transfers? Sounds good, but I'm afraid it's just talk.
Tether backing isn't necessarily reliable; the key is to look at actual trading volume.
The stablecoin payment track is indeed a way out, but so many people are already watching it.
To put it simply, it still requires real users; otherwise, it's just a concept.
Gas fees are indeed a major pain point, and there's no denying that.
View OriginalReply0
GasGuzzler
· 10h ago
Zero fees? Sounds good, but I'm worried it's just the old trick of rebranding.
View OriginalReply0
LucidSleepwalker
· 10h ago
Zero fees sound good, but can it really take off? It feels like just another PPT project.
View OriginalReply0
MercilessHalal
· 11h ago
Zero fees? Sounds too good to be true, there's no such thing in this world, right?
View OriginalReply0
WhaleStalker
· 11h ago
The idea of zero fees has been heard quite a bit, but the key is whether real money can actually be used.
Public chain competition is so fierce, but honestly, there are not many projects that truly solve problems. I see that many chains still have overly complicated transfer processes — newcomers have to first stock up on Gas fees, which discourages many people from entering.
Recently, I came across an interesting idea: some projects directly target the "stablecoin payment" need by launching a zero-fee USDT transfer mechanism. Coupled with native ecosystem token empowerment design, they make the payment experience very smooth. The brilliance of this approach is that it’s not about piling up features, but truly addressing the pain points of large-scale applications — allowing ordinary users to enjoy the convenience of Web3 without worrying about Gas costs.
More importantly, these projects are usually backed by major institutions like Tether and Bitfinex, which means they have real stablecoin infrastructure and payment channels support. Not many public chains can connect to debit card consumption scenarios, so this can be seen as a relatively clear path to commercialization. As competition among public chains becomes increasingly homogeneous, focusing on solving actual payment needs has a long-term potential that’s quite promising.