Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Tria has issued an official statement regarding recent ecosystem adjustments. The project team stated that they have quickly completed a snapshot of activity data for eligible creators to ensure that each contributor's records are complete and intact. Collaboration with platforms such as Mindo, Kaito, Cookie, and others has allowed this data to be properly preserved, and creator information within the ecosystem has been fully backed up.
The key point is that the $85,000 creator reward pool pledge remains valid. The project emphasizes that this change will not affect the previous incentive distribution based on Tria's genuine contributions. In other words, the rights accumulated by creators based on their actual contributions remain unchanged. This is a stable signal for creators who participate in ecosystem development long-term — the project team continues to honor its commitments to contributors even as strategies are adjusted.
Data backup seems reliable, but actually delivering on it is the real key.
Can Mindo really hold up to this promise? It's a bit uncertain.
It's good that they haven't run away; I've seen this kind of trick in the crypto world many times.
Let's keep observing; promises are easy, but fulfilling them is hard.
By the way, the data snapshot thing needs to be done properly. Some projects failed because of poor handling of this.
Having more backups actually makes me feel more secure, but ultimately, it depends on how much the creators can actually earn.
But no matter how good the words sound, it all depends on whether they can truly deliver in the end. Creators shouldn't just listen to promises; they need to pay close attention to the details.
Is it 85,000 or 850,000? I can't quite see clearly.
It feels like the old tricks again—renaming, adjusting data, making a bunch of promises. The actual cash seems pretty tight.
The key is when the funds will actually arrive. No matter how good the hype is now, I'm starting to become numb to it.
Instead of all this talk, wouldn't it be better to just send the money directly? Right, everyone?
---
The data backup is so meticulous, they must be really afraid of being criticized. But this attitude is indeed commendable.
---
The real contribution rights remain unchanged. It sounds good, but I'm just worried that more issues might arise later.
---
By the way, is it reliable to collaborate with platforms like Mindo, Kaito, and Cookie for data storage?
---
Creators can finally breathe a sigh of relief, at least the promises are still on the table.
---
Let's consider this adjustment as buying peace of mind. Anyway, the reward pool hasn't moved.