In a recent interview with “The Breakdown,” Michael Saylor, CEO of MicroStrategy, weighed in on the heated debate surrounding Bitcoin Ordinals. While the founder does not dismiss the significance of this phenomenon within the ecosystem, his stance is clear: protecting the integrity of the Bitcoin protocol is more important than promoting any additional features.
Support for Freedom, Opposition to Changes
Saylor clearly distinguishes two issues. On one hand, he supports every user’s right to utilize the Bitcoin network as they see fit—including embedding inscriptions. On the other hand, he firmly opposes any modifications to the fundamental code of the network that would facilitate or promote such usage. In other words: usage—yes, but without altering Bitcoin’s DNA.
Immutability as the Highest Value
For Saylor, the matter is philosophical. He sees the immutability and stability of the Bitcoin protocol as its true value. It is this aspect—rather than advanced functionalities—that should be the foundation of the network. Therefore, while he does not oppose censorship of inscriptions, he will not support any system modifications aimed at enabling or easing them.
The Market Should Decide Naturally
Saylor appeals to classical market theory: let competition and users naturally decide which solutions have a future. Good ideas will survive and develop, while bad ones will fade into obscurity. The Bitcoin network should remain an open and neutral tool for everyone—both large financial institutions and individual investors.
This approach reflects Bitcoin’s unwavering principle: minimal change, maximum stability.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Saylor clearly rejects modifications to Bitcoin in the name of inscriptions but defends the freedom to use the network.
In a recent interview with “The Breakdown,” Michael Saylor, CEO of MicroStrategy, weighed in on the heated debate surrounding Bitcoin Ordinals. While the founder does not dismiss the significance of this phenomenon within the ecosystem, his stance is clear: protecting the integrity of the Bitcoin protocol is more important than promoting any additional features.
Support for Freedom, Opposition to Changes
Saylor clearly distinguishes two issues. On one hand, he supports every user’s right to utilize the Bitcoin network as they see fit—including embedding inscriptions. On the other hand, he firmly opposes any modifications to the fundamental code of the network that would facilitate or promote such usage. In other words: usage—yes, but without altering Bitcoin’s DNA.
Immutability as the Highest Value
For Saylor, the matter is philosophical. He sees the immutability and stability of the Bitcoin protocol as its true value. It is this aspect—rather than advanced functionalities—that should be the foundation of the network. Therefore, while he does not oppose censorship of inscriptions, he will not support any system modifications aimed at enabling or easing them.
The Market Should Decide Naturally
Saylor appeals to classical market theory: let competition and users naturally decide which solutions have a future. Good ideas will survive and develop, while bad ones will fade into obscurity. The Bitcoin network should remain an open and neutral tool for everyone—both large financial institutions and individual investors.
This approach reflects Bitcoin’s unwavering principle: minimal change, maximum stability.