Interesting observation. Zama is indeed a promising technical direction, but the valuation logic is worth pondering.
I closed part of my position near 690M. To be honest, although Zama's technology is solid, based on the actual performance of Day1 FDV, the 300-400 range better reflects market reality. This is not to say the project is not good, but initial valuations often have discrepancies.
Platforms like Polymarket have taught me a key lesson — don't foolishly wait for them to "confirm" things. Once news hits the market, trading signals are right there. Instead of waiting for the market to fully digest the reaction, it's better to seize the news window opportunity immediately.
The core is to distinguish between the fundamentals of technology and market pricing. The former determines the long-term, the latter determines short-term gains. Both are important, but they should not be confused during trading.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SlowLearnerWang
· 6h ago
690M just ran away, and I'm still here waiting foolishly for confirmation...
View OriginalReply0
OnChain_Detective
· 8h ago
nah wait... pattern analysis suggests zama's Day1 FDV got some serious red flags. 690M dump screams overvaluation, not conviction. let me pull the data on similar homomorphic encryption plays — this tracks typical pre-launch hype signatures. remember folks always DYOR but the wallet clustering here... something's off
Reply0
DAOdreamer
· 8h ago
690M just ran away, how to say... Still quite clear-headed. Technical prowess ≠ reasonable valuation, it's easy to say but hard to do.
The news window approach really hit the mark; once the market "digests" it, there's basically nothing left for you. But this kind of high-frequency trading is also quite exhausting.
View OriginalReply0
WenMoon
· 8h ago
690M just ran away, wake up, buddy. I'm still picking up the pieces. Now I finally understand what it means to open high and go low.
View OriginalReply0
AllInAlice
· 8h ago
690M just ran, huh? The posture is good, but I think the opportunity to bottom out at 300-400 is also running out.
Interesting observation. Zama is indeed a promising technical direction, but the valuation logic is worth pondering.
I closed part of my position near 690M. To be honest, although Zama's technology is solid, based on the actual performance of Day1 FDV, the 300-400 range better reflects market reality. This is not to say the project is not good, but initial valuations often have discrepancies.
Platforms like Polymarket have taught me a key lesson — don't foolishly wait for them to "confirm" things. Once news hits the market, trading signals are right there. Instead of waiting for the market to fully digest the reaction, it's better to seize the news window opportunity immediately.
The core is to distinguish between the fundamentals of technology and market pricing. The former determines the long-term, the latter determines short-term gains. Both are important, but they should not be confused during trading.