2026-01-18 16:22:01

$SENT after announcing TGE details, the price dropped sharply from an initial 0.032 USD to now 0.024 USD. Some traders responded quickly during this market movement by opening short positions for hedging, successfully locking in profits.

Let's take a look at the potential gains for participants under a relatively realistic scenario of 50x oversubscription:

Each account's subscription cap is 3 BNB (about 2841 USD). With an oversubscription scale of approximately 400,000 BNB across the entire market, the actual allocation per account would be diluted to about 0.06 BNB, equivalent to roughly 57 USD. Based on this cost, participants can receive approximately 5423 $SENT tokens.

If sold entirely at the pre-listing price of 0.024 USD, the total income would be about 130 USD, with a single account profit of around 73 USD (equivalent to 0.077 BNB). At first glance, the returns may not seem particularly high, but from another perspective, this is equivalent to turning a 57 USD cost into a 130 USD return, yielding an over 100% profit.

Considering that the participation window will close tomorrow at 20:00, experienced traders recommend preparing sufficient BNB in advance and participating through multiple accounts to amplify gains. With 10 accounts, the profit base can reach over 700 USD.

For investors worried about subsequent price fluctuations, there is a hedging strategy worth noting—opening a short position on $SENT before the market opens for hedging. This way, they can participate in TGE allocations while locking in profits through short positions, forming a relatively stable profit model.

The practical issue is that many people, although having enough points quota, lack sufficient spot BNB reserves and are concerned about the risks of BNB price fluctuations during this period. To address this dilemma, there are two practical solutions: one is to combine spot BNB holdings with hedging operations simultaneously; the other is to utilize internal lending tools of major exchanges. Both methods can help ensure sufficient BNB for participation during the TGE cycle in a near risk-free or low-risk manner.

BNB1,4%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

23 Likes

Reward
23
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ArbitrageBot

· 01-21 13:24

Another trick of multi-account harvesting, looks clean but actually a zero-sum game. The price has plummeted by more than half, claiming to hedge is actually gambling—who can really lock in profits? 50x oversubscription? Uh… retail investors are diluted to 0.06 BNB, which is ridiculous, and making a $73 profit still dares to say it's more than double. 10 accounts with $700, just the borrowing costs and fees eat up more than half, can't understand this math problem. Short hedging sounds fancy, but opening a short before TGE to hedge volatility—isn't this logic a bit far-fetched?

View OriginalReply0

UnluckyMiner

· 01-21 08:48

Wait, 50x oversubscription? Is that real? The data must be pretty outrageous. Multiple accounts nesting, feels like this trick has been played too many times. 0.024 has dropped to this level, who still dares to buy in? Deadline tomorrow? The pace is too tight, obviously trying to cut the last wave. A 100% return sounds great, but the cost is only 57? I feel like there’s a trap. Short hedge sounds good, but who dares to bet against the trend at this point? I really don’t understand the risks involved in the internal lending tools. For miners’ daily operations, I only see others making money; my small account can’t play this game. Once the oversubscription scale loosens, the entire calculation will collapse. It all feels like after-the-fact analysis; those who were really making money have already run away.

View OriginalReply0

GlueGuy

· 01-20 09:39

50x oversubscription directly failed, and those still buying the dip are probably just seeking psychological comfort Multi-account arbitrage sounds great, but does anyone really operate it without crashing? The theory of hedging short positions is everywhere, but in practice, most people slip up at least 80% of the time Still wanting to borrow and participate despite BNB being insufficient—your risk awareness is truly lacking Why haven't those who entered at high levels earlier cut their losses yet?

View OriginalReply0

LeverageAddict

· 01-19 20:53

This routine is so familiar, it's either over-raising dilution or multi-account amplification. In the end, it's just a rhythm of cutting leeks. Wait, can still fall to 0.024? It looks like it still needs to test the bottom. 10 accounts for $700? Bro, how much do you have to work to manage those accounts? I can't even bother with just one. Short hedging sounds good, but I guess not many can actually execute it. Most are still caught in the trap. Insufficient BNB and still want to participate? Isn't this just covertly encouraging you to borrow and enter? Be careful, you might not even be able to earn back the borrowing interest in the end.

View OriginalReply0

HappyMinerUncle

· 01-18 16:52

Here we go again, cutting the leek. It dropped from 0.032 to 0.024 just like that? I've seen this trick countless times. Projects that can really double in value have already exploded. Multi-account arbitrage? Give me a break, the fees would eat up half the profit. Short hedge sounds good, but who can calculate the risks clearly? Anyway, I don't touch it. Is BNB still lacking? It's a bit late now, everyone. Instead of messing around with these fancy tricks, it's better to buy some mainstream coins for stability. A profit of 73 dollars, and I still have to juggle a bunch of accounts. What's the point?

View OriginalReply0

StableBoi

· 01-18 16:48

Ah, damn it, a 50x oversubscription directly wipes out the market. This is the daily life of Web3. Multiple accounts handled, 700 bucks I can accept. The short hedge trick is indeed brilliant, but you need BNB to do it. Risk-free profit? Just hear about it, the risk is always there.

View OriginalReply0

SudoRm-RfWallet/

· 01-18 16:40

I’ve known this multi-account wool-gathering scheme for a long time, it all depends on who’s faster This is crazy, oversubscription by 50 times and directly diluted to trash Bro, this wave of short hedging is really clever, why didn’t I think of it As long as BNB doesn’t plummet, this logic still has some merit Deadline tomorrow? Damn, I don’t have enough BNB, and I’m afraid of liquidation if I borrow A 100% return rate sounds good, but in reality, it’s just a mosquito’s leg Ten accounts with $700? How many small accounts would it take to tinker with that This hedging strategy sounds great, but the actual operation is not easy at all The price has already dropped from 0.032 to 0.024, should it go lower? Participating with multiple accounts also sounds risky, isn’t it supposed to be risk-free?

View OriginalReply0

BrokenRugs

· 01-18 16:34

Wait, 50x oversubscription? Is this data real? It seems a bit unbelievable. I've seen this multi-account arbitrage trick too many times, and most people end up losing money in the end. Doubling in the short term sounds great, but with the pre-market price already falling like this, what room is there for further growth? This round of short covering is indeed clever, but very few people can execute it properly. BNB's current lending interest rates are so high that the seventy-dollar profit can't even cover the costs.

View OriginalReply0

retroactive_airdrop

· 01-18 16:32

To be honest, 50x oversubscription directly cut profits in half, pretty unlucky. Multi-account strategy is aggressive, but who's willing to bet on BNB lending risks? Short hedging sounds good on paper, but with such poor pre-market liquidity, can it actually work in practice? This 0.024 price point seems like it'll keep getting hammered. Might not be able to exit tomorrow for sure.

View OriginalReply0