2026-01-15 11:24:51

Standard Chartered's latest "Global Outlook 2026" report offers an interesting assessment: next year, the global economy's growth rate will be roughly the same as this year, maintaining around 3.4%. It seems calm on the surface, but significant changes are happening beneath.

What are the core changes? In 2025, the economy mainly benefited from monetary policy dividends and the positive effects of early export strategies. By 2026, these drivers will gradually weaken. They will be replaced by expansionary fiscal policies from governments and corporate investments, especially massive AI-related expenditures, which will become new engines of growth. In other words, the "engine" of economic growth is shifting.

How will major economies perform specifically? The US has been upgraded the most, from 1.7% to 2.3%, due to the recovery of the labor market, the implementation of corporate tax cuts, and a surge in investment driven by AI application competitions. China has also been upgraded from 4.3% to 4.6%, mainly because pessimistic trade expectations are gradually easing and export diversification is deepening. The Eurozone is a bit worse, only moving slightly from 1.0% to 1.1%, as trade pressures and internal development imbalances continue to weigh down growth. What about export-oriented economies in Asia? They might be among the few regions to slow down, as the wave of "early export" benefits diminishes.

But don't be too optimistic. Geopolitical conflicts, trade policy uncertainties, and important elections in multiple countries all pose significant "fat tail risks." Coupled with policy swings in various nations, economic stability faces hidden dangers. However, if AI can truly deliver unexpected productivity boosts, it might become an unforeseen upward force.

So, the key question for 2026 is: can the global economy smoothly transition from the old growth model to a new one driven by fiscal policies, domestic investments, and new technologies? The success or failure of this transition could determine whether next year's economy remains calm or is bubbling with hidden currents.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

19 Likes

Reward
19
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

probably_nothing_anon

· 01-18 08:25

AI is once again guaranteed to win effortlessly. Truly amazing. Whether the combined logic of fiscal policy and AI investment as dual engines can hold up is the real game-changer.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHunterXiao

· 01-17 13:51

Engine switching, but Europe is still starting up...

View OriginalReply0

GasGuzzler

· 01-17 06:07

Is the engine switching? To put it simply, it's a gamble on AI. Whether we can win this round is really uncertain. The 1.1% in the Eurozone makes everyone uncomfortable; it feels like Europe is about to be left behind again. The real risk is this wave of geopolitical tail risks. Good data can't withstand a sudden shock. The US tax cuts + AI boom have directly pushed the rate to 2.3%, making it a clear winner mentality. China's 4.6% isn't bad either; it all depends on how to stabilize it. Export dividends are fading, and small Asian countries will suffer. Switching tracks isn't that easy. This 3.4% figure looks stable, but your analysis makes me even more anxious... How long can fiscal policies hold up? It seems like every country is just guessing blindly.

View OriginalReply0

MergeConflict

· 01-15 11:57

It's that same set of "seems stable but actually major changes" statements. I just want to ask, can AI really save the economy? --- The 1.1% figure for the Eurozone is hilarious; it's better to just relax. --- Why is the US being upgraded again? Where's the recession that was promised? If tax cuts really worked, it would have shown by now. --- The key issue is still all these messy geopolitical matters. No matter how beautiful the data models are, they can't withstand a sudden shock. --- Is China's 4.6% figure reliable? Diversifying exports sounds good, but who really knows how it will turn out in practice? --- AI productivity looks promising, but real results and ROI will only be seen by 2027. --- Switching engines sounds easy, but in reality, coordinating policies across countries? That's just a dream.

View OriginalReply0

PoolJumper

· 01-15 11:40

Engine switching sounds good, but I'm more concerned about the word "disaster" in the Eurozone. Can they really turn things around? Still the same point, AI dividends are distributed very unevenly, and the US is going to win again. Trade policy has too many variables; it feels like 2026 will be more exciting than the surface numbers suggest. A 3.4% growth rate sounds stable, but with so many fundamental logic changes, it's hard to believe it can really stay stable. Fiscal policy takes over... every country's purse strings need to be tightened, but is that realistic?

View OriginalReply0

FomoAnxiety

· 01-15 11:34

Basically, the gameplay has changed. Don't be fooled by the similar percentage increases; the source of the money behind them is completely different. I believe China's 4.6%, but the Eurozone's 1.1% is really disappointing. Why isn't it moving yet? Over in the US, AI investments are picking up. Can we keep up... I'm a bit anxious. The key is whether this "switch" can go smoothly. If anything goes wrong in the process, it could be a big problem. There are a bunch of tail risks, geopolitical issues and others that are unpredictable, more frightening than the numbers themselves.

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketSurvivor

· 01-15 11:29

Huh, 3.4% looks unchanged, but is the engine being replaced? Feels like it's boosting itself, and the geopolitical powder keg is igniting at any moment. If the AI concept crashes again, it's all over.

View OriginalReply0