Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Futures Kickoff
Get prepared for your futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to experience risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
#数字资产市场动态 Why do most people in the contract market always lose more than they gain?
Many traders will notice a strange phenomenon after trading for a while: setting stop losses often results in being precisely liquidated, while not setting stop losses leaves them stuck on the brink of liquidation, stubbornly fighting. No matter how they adjust, it seems as if they are "anchored" in place.
But this is not a matter of luck; fundamentally, it is a cognitive dilemma.
You think you're fighting against the market, but in reality, you're betting with a set of structurally unfavorable rules. Your position size, leverage multiple, liquidation price—these are all transparent data, with no privacy involved.
This leads to a deadly asymmetry: when you win, you scrape a few points of profit; when you lose, you wipe out everything in one go. Even earning profits ten or twenty times isn't enough to fill the hole caused by a single liquidation.
The root cause of most people's long-term losses is not that they can't read the trend, but that the risk-reward ratio structure has been wrong from the very beginning.
Your trading framework, risk allocation, and position management—any deviation from the actual laws of the derivatives market—destines you to keep hitting walls. Some traders spend a lot of time optimizing entry points, but it's all in vain because they haven't even figured out that their risk tolerance system itself has fundamental flaws.