In the current information landscape, credibility hinges on objectivity—or at least the perception of it. Long-time listeners often gravitate toward voices perceived as balanced, those willing to explore multiple angles without rigid ideology. Yet consensus on what constitutes "objective" remains fragmented. After 15 years of engagement, audiences develop strong priors about who delivers fair analysis versus pushes predetermined narratives. The tension between subjective expertise and neutral presentation defines modern media consumption, especially in spaces like crypto where misinformation spreads rapidly. What audiences actually seek: consistency, intellectual honesty, and willingness to challenge their own assumptions.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
BlockchainArchaeologistvip
· 8h ago
Oh, isn't that just saying that no one is truly objective, everyone just seeks out voices that confirm their own views?
View OriginalReply0
StablecoinArbitrageurvip
· 20h ago
ngl, this "objectivity" thing is basically a liquidity mirage. everyone thinks they're running a fair analysis until the order book gets thin and suddenly all those "balanced takes" collapse into the same direction. seen it play out 10k times in backtesting...
Reply0
RegenRestorervip
· 01-08 19:05
Nah, listening to this makes me think of those influencers who constantly claim to be "objective and neutral," but then turn around and stir the pot... so ironic.
View OriginalReply0
GweiObservervip
· 01-08 19:05
This guy is right, that's how the crypto world is. Everyone claims to be objective, but in the end, everyone has their own "stance."
View OriginalReply0
DefiPlaybookvip
· 01-08 19:03
According to data, approximately 73% of crypto community users prioritize trusting voices with "consistency" — and this article is right. However, it is worth noting that the so-called "objectivity" is often a false proposition in on-chain governance; the power structure determines the voice, which is a chronic issue in traditional financial systems that Web3 is also repeating.
View OriginalReply0
AllTalkLongTradervip
· 01-08 18:55
To be honest, after 15 years, what's there to argue about regarding objectivity? Isn't it just everyone saying their own thing... The truly reliable voices are actually just a few; the rest are just selling stories.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-a180694bvip
· 01-08 18:38
It sounds like everyone thinks they are objective, but in reality, they are just selling their own perspective... Especially in the crypto world, there are too many who claim to be "neutral analysts," but they are just brainwashing from a different angle.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)