Market typically follows certain ratio patterns when valuing blockchain networks. Take a straightforward example: when comparing a Layer 1 blockchain against its flagship ecosystem token, the valuation gap reveals something interesting.
Using token FDV as the metric, ETH demonstrates this dynamic clearly—it trades at roughly 101x the valuation of major ecosystem projects built on it. This ratio isn't arbitrary; it reflects how the market prices the base layer infrastructure against the applications built on top.
Understanding these "normal market ratios" is crucial for spotting where valuations diverge from historical patterns. When a project breaks this mold, it signals either massive undervaluation or market mispricing worth examining.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
17 Likes
Reward
17
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ser_we_are_early
· 01-08 16:01
Basically, the 101x ratio of ETH is a bit outrageous, and it feels like the ecosystem projects are all being undervalued...
View OriginalReply0
SoliditySlayer
· 01-08 15:59
A 101x gap? The market ratio is all over the place now; gotta find out who stepped into the trap.
View OriginalReply0
unrekt.eth
· 01-08 15:50
The 101x multiplier is really incredible; it feels like most ecosystem tokens are being suppressed to the extreme.
View OriginalReply0
DefiSecurityGuard
· 01-08 15:46
ngl the 101x ratio thing is interesting but... has anyone actually *audited* these FDV calculations? feels like comparing apples to oranges when half the projects use dodgy tokenomics. DYOR fr fr
Reply0
OnChainSleuth
· 01-08 15:37
Is the number 101x outrageous? It feels like the ecosystem tokens are being suppressed to death.
The EPIC Anomaly Explained
Market typically follows certain ratio patterns when valuing blockchain networks. Take a straightforward example: when comparing a Layer 1 blockchain against its flagship ecosystem token, the valuation gap reveals something interesting.
Using token FDV as the metric, ETH demonstrates this dynamic clearly—it trades at roughly 101x the valuation of major ecosystem projects built on it. This ratio isn't arbitrary; it reflects how the market prices the base layer infrastructure against the applications built on top.
Understanding these "normal market ratios" is crucial for spotting where valuations diverge from historical patterns. When a project breaks this mold, it signals either massive undervaluation or market mispricing worth examining.