2026-01-08 10:45:29

DeepNode ($DN) recently announced its listing on several top-tier exchanges, making a significant move. I previously mentioned this AI project, and I didn't expect it to expand so quickly. The simultaneous launch on multiple exchanges usually indicates that the project has thoroughly prepared in terms of liquidity reserves and market deployment.

DeepNode aims to solve a very interesting problem—"Who is model developers really working for?" The idea behind this project is to allow AI model developers to truly own their intellectual property, rather than becoming a subcontractor for a centralized platform. Specifically, there are two main points:

First is ownership rights. Developers retain ownership of the models they build, no longer just acting as suppliers for large platforms. This changes the game for independent developers. Second is economic incentives. Model developers can directly earn revenue without multiple layers of profit sharing.

From this perspective, DeepNode hits a real pain point of the AI era—the demand for a decentralized model ecosystem. The fact that multiple exchanges are launching simultaneously may indicate that market recognition for such projects is on the rise.

DN14,04%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

17 Likes

Reward
17
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

AirdropHunterXiao

· 01-11 10:44

Launching on multiple exchanges simultaneously definitely shows that the project team has some capabilities; they've laid a good foundation for liquidity.

View OriginalReply0

FunGibleTom

· 01-10 19:11

Launching simultaneously on multiple exchanges is indeed no small feat. This rollout is quite interesting. Confident that developers can control their own IP logic—Web3 should be played like this. The $DN angle is quite bold; long-term model developers have been squeezed by big corporations and should resist. But is the liquidity deep enough? Launching on multiple exchanges is easy; maintaining the hype is the real key. Decentralized model ecosystems sound great, but I worry it might just be another project with a slick story. However, the fact that independent developers can directly benefit truly addresses a neglected pain point. How are the recent funding figures? Are there comparable projects, or is DN an entirely original model? It seems that for projects in the AI track like this, ultimately, the activity level of the community and developer ecosystem will determine success.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropNinja

· 01-10 18:32

Launching multiple chains sounds good, but I wonder how long this liquidity can last. Developers controlling their own IP? Just listen, in the end, they'll still be working for the platform. This logic is interesting, but can the ownership of AI models really be implemented? $DN's rollout feels like paving the way for what's coming next. If it truly allows developers to profit directly, OpenAI would have changed it long ago. Multiple exchanges launching is good, but can the price stay stable? That's the key. Ownership issues sound nice in theory, but execution is difficult. I understand the pain points of AI developers, but why can this project solve them? The old path of multiple exchange launches has been tried before; let's see how the market reacts first.

View OriginalReply0

ForkTrooper

· 01-09 04:36

Multi-chain deployment is so fast, and the liquidity is well established... but don't forget, OpenAI and these folks have long thought through this logic. Can DN truly give developers a voice? That's the key.

View OriginalReply0

GasGuru

· 01-08 11:13

Multiple exchanges launching simultaneously, this speed is indeed quite impressive. However, the fact that developers regain IP ownership really hits the mark. Having worked for big companies for so long, why should the benefits be tiered? The DN approach is quite satisfying, but I wonder how it will actually be implemented. When exchanges launch simultaneously, it usually indicates good liquidity, but it depends on whether they can truly attract developers to participate later on; otherwise, it's just another concept coin.

View OriginalReply0

DegenTherapist

· 01-08 11:13

Having multiple exchanges launch simultaneously does have some significance, but how many developers can truly utilize it? Just shouting about ownership and direct benefits isn't enough; the key still depends on how the profit-sharing model is designed.

View OriginalReply0

SignatureLiquidator

· 01-08 11:10

Synchronized across multiple exchanges, which indeed shows there are some tricks involved. The developers' autonomous ownership really hits a sore spot; those big platforms used to take too much. But rushing to expand across the entire network, whether liquidity is sufficient still remains to be seen. We need to observe the depth of trading pairs to avoid falling into another wave of leek-cutting schemes. It's only meaningful if the AI track can truly benefit developers. I just don't know how well this project's token economic model is designed; I've seen too many air coins.

View OriginalReply0

SchrodingerProfit

· 01-08 11:01

The multi-chain simultaneous launch is just a routine, piling up liquidity. How many can truly survive? Developers are indeed being squeezed, but can this decentralized model withstand the crackdown from big corporations in terms of profit distribution? It's a bit uncertain. In this round of market, projects like these are crowded together. It's better to look at the team's real background and the speed of product iteration. A rapid increase in token price doesn't mean the ecosystem is truly functioning. Beware of air projects disguised with AI.

View OriginalReply0

SlowLearnerWang

· 01-08 10:56

It's another case of hindsight. I only saw the multi-chain launch now. If I had known earlier, I wouldn't have missed it.

View OriginalReply0