2026-01-08 10:44:40

The AI project DeepNode ($DN), which we discussed earlier, announced a major event in the past few days—simultaneous launches on multiple exchanges. What does this synchronized move indicate? It shows that the project has indeed put effort into liquidity and market deployment.

But what's truly interesting is not just the launch itself. DeepNode aims to solve a fundamental problem in the entire AI model ecosystem: who are developers actually working for?

Simply put, most model developers today are like factory workers—what they develop still belongs to the centralized platforms. Your IP, your creativity, your data accumulation are all locked within someone else's ecosystem.

DeepNode's logic is to break this pattern. There are two main improvements:

First is ownership return. Allow model developers to truly own their developed IP and assets, rather than just being suppliers under a large platform. Developers' innovative成果 should belong to the developers themselves, which can inspire more people to contribute.

Second is to build a more open and自由 model ecosystem. Not limited to a single platform, model developers can自主 decide on commercialization paths.

In the current collision of AI and crypto, projects like this are indeed exploring new directions. Multiple exchange launches also provide participants with more choices.

DN-0,29%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

21 Likes

Reward
21
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

FudVaccinator

· 01-11 02:53

Ownership returns to developers? Sounds great, but can it really be achieved... --- All exchanges moving in sync, liquidity layout is serious, but how long this wave of hype can last is uncertain --- Developers working for big companies is indeed heartbreaking, but can DeepNode break the monopoly? I have my doubts --- It's the same old Web3 savior routine, no matter how good the pitch, ultimately it depends on whether developers can be retained --- Wait, can it truly enable developers to commercialize independently? That's much more difficult than promises --- I like the idea, but does launching on multiple exchanges really mean decentralization? I think that's overthinking --- Returning IP ownership, if that's really implemented, it would be a reform. But who will ensure it? --- Moving in sync to launch this setup, I've seen it too many times before, just a liquidity trap --- What's interesting is the developer ecosystem—if they can really pull it off, OpenAI will be crying

View OriginalReply0

PhantomHunter

· 01-10 16:04

The operation of going multi-chain basically means preparing to inject liquidity aggressively; otherwise, it’s easy to become a worthless coin. It sounds logical, but will developers really jump in... that’s the key. Ownership return has been heard a hundred times, but the crucial point is whether there’s money to be made. Can DN break through this wave? I have some doubts, but multi-chain is indeed a good signal. It sounds nice, but it still depends on whether the ecosystem can truly come to life.

View OriginalReply0

NFTArtisanHQ

· 01-08 11:14

hmm, the whole "ownership reversion" framing here is giving me benjamin's mechanical reproduction but inverted through smart contracts... like, are we actually solving for creative sovereignty or just tokenizing the same extraction logic? interesting tension tbh

Reply0

GasGasGasBro

· 01-08 11:07

Having multiple exchanges listing sounds good, but how many projects can truly help developers turn things around? DN's logic sounds great, but I'm worried it might just be another slogan project.

View OriginalReply0

ImpermanentPhilosopher

· 01-08 11:06

Hmm... Returning ownership sounds good, but can it really break the monopoly of OpenAI and its team? --- All exchanges are moving in sync, liquidity is indeed well-prepared, betting that this wave can hold up. --- Developers' IP being locked up has been annoying for a long time. If DeepNode can really pull it off, that would be amazing. --- Decentralization and open ecosystems again, sounds like a story... how it actually turns out still depends. --- But forget it, let's wait until someone makes money before talking. It's too early to draw conclusions now. --- I just want to know if the price will crash after multiple exchanges go live—that's the core issue. --- The factory worker analogy is spot on; that's exactly how it feels. Someone should have stepped up to do this long ago. --- Can ownership really be returned to developers? Just listen to it; centralized platforms won't give up power. --- Interesting as it is, how many can truly stick with ecosystem development?

View OriginalReply0

Ser_This_Is_A_Casino

· 01-08 11:04

Multiple exchanges launching simultaneously sounds promising, and liquidity indeed needs to be built up. But honestly, whether developer ownership can truly be realized depends on subsequent ecosystem operations. Right now, it feels like everyone is just telling stories.

View OriginalReply0