2026-01-08 10:31:41

#密码资产动态追踪 Yesterday, I adjusted the strategy, shifting from a bullish to a bearish rhythm. Currently, Ethereum short positions are floating with a profit of a hundred points, and $BTC remains held.

Market changes are indeed quite fast. A few days ago, there was a feeling of a potential bull market, but recent daily candles have been continuously engulfing, and even the US stock market's rise yesterday couldn't stop the decline of $SOL — which really illustrates the point.

Looking at Bitcoin, the 90,000 level has already been broken. If it doesn't recover in the short term, this level might turn into resistance. We need to keep a close eye on how 90,000 performs and then decide the next step.

Ethereum has already fallen back 200 points from its high. There is some support around 3100, but the real key is whether 3000 can hold. Until the situation becomes clearer, I won't add to my short positions.

The plan is to reduce 50% at 3001. If it breaks below that, I'll decide whether to continue holding. Market rhythm is very important; we need to keep up.

ETH-6,67%

BTC-3,85%

SOL-5,3%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

7 Likes

Reward
7
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GateUser-c802f0e8

· 01-11 10:31

The bearish momentum has started, losing 90,000 is quite aggressive. We must hold the 3,000 level well this time.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropworkerZhang

· 01-09 20:03

The short-term rhythm is indeed correct this time. Be cautious if Bitcoin falls below 90,000. Ethereum long position has a decent floating profit of 100 points, but the key level at 3000 must be held. This market changes direction too quickly; if you can't keep up, you'll get cut. Hey, what's your plan with reducing your position at 3001? Aren't you afraid of a rebound smashing in? It feels like lately it's all about cutting leeks at high levels, cycling around and returning to the original point.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoComedian

· 01-08 11:01

Laughing until tears, today is another day dominated by 90,000 A hundred points floating profit on the short position is pretty good, but this is exactly the time when it's easiest to be reckless and add to the position. I choose to admit defeat. If we can't hold 3000, we'll continue to short; if we hold it, I'll admit defeat. Market rhythm always comes first. Even if US stocks rise, it can't stop SOL from falling. This is called everyone doing their own thing, right? So true.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidityWhisperer

· 01-08 11:01

90,000 broken and still want to come back? Wishful thinking, the resistance level has already been set in stone.

View OriginalReply0

RadioShackKnight

· 01-08 11:01

Losing 90000 is really intense this time, it feels like the bull market vibe has indeed faded. If Bitcoin can't recover this level, it will be really awkward; we need to see how it performs later. A hundred points floating profit on the short position is pretty good, just need to keep an eye on the rhythm and avoid being reckless. The 3000 defense line must be held; if it's broken, it will be a big deal.

View OriginalReply0

GweiWatcher

· 01-08 10:56

90000 is really a hurdle; once broken, it feels like the subsequent space opens up. Wow, SOL's recent decline really leaves no room for negotiation; even the US stock market can't save it. Can 3000 still hold? It feels quite uncertain. The rhythm in the crypto circle changes so quickly; a few days ago, I still wanted to buy more, now I have to follow the short side. The plan to reduce positions is reliable; avoiding greed is the most important.

View OriginalReply0

SatoshiHeir

· 01-08 10:46

It should be pointed out that your "daily engulfing theory" still remains at the superficial level of technical analysis—on-chain data has long since discredited this view. Losing the 90,000 level is not a reversal of resistance, but an inevitable result of macro liquidity exhaustion, which was discussed in last year's research report.

View OriginalReply0