Staying in an echo chamber for too long, you will definitely recall the original form of "subscriptions"—not controlled by algorithms, not exploited by platforms, and you can watch whatever you want. Speaking of which, RSS3 is aimed at this very issue.
It's actually not that complicated; it's simply taking the traditional RSS "pure subscription" logic and moving it into Web3. It sounds simple, but it immediately breaks through many people's mental blocks. Your blogger switches platforms? No problem. Because RSS3 uses distributed storage to pin content on the chain, even if the platform goes bankrupt, the content remains. Want to view on-chain transactions, blog updates, and social information all in one window? Sure, one interface handles it all, no more switching back and forth between a dozen apps.
Compared to those Web3 projects that shout about "disrupting the era" every day, RSS3 seems a bit "ordinary"—without flashy marketing, just straightforwardly solving the issue of "free flow of information." This is more like what Web3 should do: not a tool for harvesting profits, but something that truly restores user control.
RSS3 may not yet be a topic for everyone, but the direction it points to is definitely correct. Frankly, who wouldn't want their information subscriptions to be entirely under their own control?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
19 Likes
Reward
19
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
PretendingToReadDocs
· 15h ago
Finally, someone has clarified this matter. It's much more reliable than those projects that boast every day.
View OriginalReply0
FortuneTeller42
· 01-10 05:43
This guy is reliable, finally seeing a project that doesn't cut the leeks.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoGoldmine
· 01-08 22:43
This idea is interesting, but it depends on whether the long-term ROI can outperform the computational costs of centralized solutions. While the information flow feels free and enjoyable to listen to, the question is who will pay for the costs of distributed storage, which ultimately gets passed on to the users.
View OriginalReply0
BlockImposter
· 01-08 10:54
To be honest, this is what true Web3 should be doing.
View OriginalReply0
ImpermanentPhobia
· 01-08 10:54
Oops, finally a Web3 project that isn't just bragging.
View OriginalReply0
DeFiCaffeinator
· 01-08 10:51
Finally, someone is doing real work, not just bragging every day.
View OriginalReply0
ProbablyNothing
· 01-08 10:41
No more words, this is exactly what I've been wanting.
View OriginalReply0
TestnetFreeloader
· 01-08 10:31
Finally, someone dares to do this. Tired of being manipulated by algorithms.
View OriginalReply0
TxFailed
· 01-08 10:31
ngl, heard this pitch before... distributed storage sounds nice until you realize indexing a thousand feeds actually costs gas and nobody talks about that. classic web3 move tbh
Staying in an echo chamber for too long, you will definitely recall the original form of "subscriptions"—not controlled by algorithms, not exploited by platforms, and you can watch whatever you want. Speaking of which, RSS3 is aimed at this very issue.
It's actually not that complicated; it's simply taking the traditional RSS "pure subscription" logic and moving it into Web3. It sounds simple, but it immediately breaks through many people's mental blocks. Your blogger switches platforms? No problem. Because RSS3 uses distributed storage to pin content on the chain, even if the platform goes bankrupt, the content remains. Want to view on-chain transactions, blog updates, and social information all in one window? Sure, one interface handles it all, no more switching back and forth between a dozen apps.
Compared to those Web3 projects that shout about "disrupting the era" every day, RSS3 seems a bit "ordinary"—without flashy marketing, just straightforwardly solving the issue of "free flow of information." This is more like what Web3 should do: not a tool for harvesting profits, but something that truly restores user control.
RSS3 may not yet be a topic for everyone, but the direction it points to is definitely correct. Frankly, who wouldn't want their information subscriptions to be entirely under their own control?