2026-01-08 10:24:04

Think about how this shifts things at ground level: autonomous systems stop waiting around for instructions. Instead, they actually hunt down work, pool resources with other systems, hash out who does what, and pack up once the job's finished. This completely reframes what vehicles, robots, and AI agents become—they're no longer just tools sitting at the end of a chain. They turn into active players operating inside a living task marketplace. That's the real difference.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

LiquidityWitch

· 10h ago

NGL, this sounds like releasing AIs to play the economic system themselves... Can we really trust it?

View OriginalReply0

TaxEvader

· 14h ago

But doesn't this sound like we're about to lose our jobs again? If autonomous systems find work on their own, then what's the point of us playing around...

View OriginalReply0

ForumLurker

· 01-10 10:43

Hmm, this logic sounds like turning the AI system into an independent startup team, but can it really coordinate resource allocation well... It feels like it could get chaotic.

View OriginalReply0

ser_ngmi

· 01-08 10:54

Something's not right. If this continues, autonomous systems will truly become independent labor forces. What about humans?

View OriginalReply0

RetailTherapist

· 01-08 10:53

Wow, this is the ultimate form of autonomous intelligent agents—no longer waiting for instructions, directly finding tasks to do on their own?

View OriginalReply0

MidnightTrader

· 01-08 10:49

This is what I find most attractive about Web3: autonomous systems finding work on their own, negotiating resource allocation, and disbanding after completion... It really resembles a decentralized gig economy, but in a machine version. --- Awesome, from being passive tools to active participants. If this really takes off, it would be so much more exciting. It’s much more flexible than the current centralized system. --- Wait, if that's the case, who will set the rules? Won't it eventually be monopolized by the autonomous systems of some big capital? --- The combination of autonomy + task marketplace is truly the dream of cypherpunks, but honestly, the security issues of this system need to be carefully considered. --- Haha, talking to me about autonomy here, I’m more concerned about how these systems split the earnings. Will it just revert to the old centralized way? --- Isn’t it just a machine version of a collaboration protocol? Sounds explosive, but the real challenge is how to design the game theory part, or else it’s still easy to manipulate.

View OriginalReply0

SleepyValidator

· 01-08 10:41

Wow, does this mean the autonomous system is starting to find work on its own? I feel a bit scared.

View OriginalReply0

ChainDetective

· 01-08 10:39

Wow, this is true autonomy, no longer just passive execution. Autonomous systems find their own tasks, coordinate themselves, and withdraw after completion? That’s a pretty bold model. It feels like upgrading from the gig economy to an intelligent agent economy—independent but able to collaborate. But on the other hand, if this is rolled out on a large scale, who will bear the risks? This level of enthusiasm is impressive, a real paradigm shift. Wait, in this case, wouldn’t the market mechanism become ridiculously competitive... Actually, looking at on-chain data, if these systems record transactions on the chain, what interesting footprints would they leave behind?

View OriginalReply0