2026-01-08 10:21:29

Most creator token projects miss the mark on their go-to-market approach. The real playbook? Launch with a solid foundation first—accumulate bags through a tight-knit community that actually believes in the vision. Stabilize the floor before bringing artists into the ecosystem. Here's why: if you rush onboarding, the usual traders jump in, dump aggressively, and wreck the price action before you've even established credibility. You need that community moat to absorb volatility and hold the narrative. Token launch success isn't about speed—it's about sequencing. Build foundation → attract community → then integrate creators. This way, early believers compound their belief, chart integrity holds up, and creators join a project with real momentum rather than a pump-and-dump.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

21 Likes

Reward
21
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

HodlVeteran

· 01-11 09:45

I give high praise to this logic. Back then, I was among the group eager to get on board, only to be trapped for a year or two before realizing this truth... Now looking at creator coin projects, 99% are just trying to quickly make money, resulting in a cycle of new retail investors being exploited. There is no real community. First, you need to let the believers accumulate enough chips and stabilize the fundamentals, so you can withstand the subsequent sell-offs. It's like driving—if you insist on starting in second gear, your car will eventually break down.

View OriginalReply0

NFTRegretDiary

· 01-09 10:42

Come on, it's the same old theory... I've seen too many projects claiming "foundation first," but in reality, they're just using retail investors as bagholders.

View OriginalReply0

MoonBoi42

· 01-09 07:34

NGL, I've already explained the logic behind this sequencing, and it seems that someone finally understands. Most projects are just rushing for quick gains, starting to pump before laying a solid foundation.

View OriginalReply0

gas_fee_trauma

· 01-08 10:51

Nah, this sequencing logic is correct, but in reality, how many projects can truly hold their ground without rushing... Most are still driven crazy by the funding timeline.

View OriginalReply0

ThatsNotARugPull

· 01-08 10:49

ngl this is the fatal flaw of creator tokens... too many projects rush for quick gains and pump the price, only to cool off in three days I think the idea of sequencing is correct, but the reality is most teams can't wait that long, with funding pressures looming The step of floor stabilization is really easy to overlook, and a community moat might just be a bunch of retail investors Honestly, the difference between true believers and retail investors is just one chart performance... when the price crashes, everyone runs

View OriginalReply0

MEVictim

· 01-08 10:48

Nah, this set of theories sounds good, but in reality, the projects that can actually do it are few and far between... Most of them are still about raising funds first and then talking.

View OriginalReply0

ProposalDetective

· 01-08 10:47

Nah, this sequence theory is really just about delaying the shipment. No matter how good it sounds, it can't change the essence of harvesting the leeks.

View OriginalReply0

TokenTaxonomist

· 01-08 10:46

per my analysis, this sequencing framework is taxonomically sound but statistically underestimates the volatility absorption capacity of retail-driven communities. the data actually suggests floor stabilization happens *after* initial price discovery, not before. let me pull up my spreadsheet on this...

Reply0

token_therapist

· 01-08 10:30

That's right, too many projects just want to quickly siphon funds and then run away, not really interested in building a community moat. This logic is actually quite clear: establish a solid foundation first, or else the dump will happen in minutes. I just want to ask, how many teams can truly withstand the boring early stage? Most are still short-sighted and eager for quick gains.

View OriginalReply0

ILCollector

· 01-08 10:29

To be honest, I've seen this logic too many times, and the result is always the same old trick. The so-called community moat is nine times out of ten just a breeding ground for internal exploitation.

View OriginalReply0