2026-01-08 09:40:16

#密码资产动态追踪 This wave of market movement still seems to have room to go down. If it really drops below 400, it will be the time to pile in for the bottom. But it depends on whether the trading volume is strong enough; volume and price need to work together for it to be reliable. What do you all think about the current entry points?

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

20 Likes

Reward
20
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GasFeeCrier

· 01-11 00:55

I also want to copy below 400, but I'm afraid of copying halfway up the mountain.

View OriginalReply0

CodeAuditQueen

· 01-08 23:06

The logic of price-volume matching is fine, but the key is to see if big players are quietly accumulating at the bottom... Otherwise, it's a false signal, like a re-entry vulnerability. It looks executable but isn't.

View OriginalReply0

liquiditea_sipper

· 01-08 10:10

Below 400, I'll go all in directly, but for now I still need to wait and see.

View OriginalReply0

PriceOracleFairy

· 01-08 10:09

nah volume's been sus lately... the correlation breakdown between spot and perps is giving me major red flags tbh. that 400 level might be a liquidity trap fr

Reply0

RooftopReserver

· 01-08 10:06

Talking about bottom-fishing with insufficient volume, I think it's uncertain.

View OriginalReply0

SnapshotBot

· 01-08 09:58

I'm really tempted below 400, but I don't have any bullets right now, so frustrating.

View OriginalReply0

DAOplomacy

· 01-08 09:40

tbh the whole "volume-price alignment" framework assumes rational actors, which... historical precedent suggests is arguably non-trivial to achieve in these market conditions. the sub-optimal incentive structures around panic selling make that 400 level pretty speculative imo. path dependency matters here tho.

Reply0