【ChainNews】South Korea’s stablecoin policy has new developments. According to the latest submitted amendment bill, the Korea Financial Services Commission (FSC) now supports the central bank’s plan—limiting the issuance rights of stablecoins to alliances led by banks with majority control.
What does this mean? Banks must hold the majority of shares, but tech companies also have a chance to participate—as long as they become the largest single shareholder and the banks maintain overall control. It sounds like a balance, giving traditional financial institutions a say while leaving room for technological innovation.
But that’s not all. The days for exchanges will become more stringent. The new regulations will raise standards for information technology stability, require mandatory compensation for damages caused by hacking attacks, and impose fines up to 10% of annual revenue. In other words, security vulnerabilities are no longer just technical issues but come with real financial costs.
The entry threshold for stablecoin issuers has also been set—at least 5 billion Korean won (about $3.7 million) in paid-in capital. As the market develops, this number may be increased.
Interestingly, the ruling party, financial regulators, and the central bank do not have entirely aligned views on this plan. Members of parliament are preparing a special working group to discuss alternative options. The final direction of the policy will depend on subsequent negotiations.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
bridgeOops
· 01-10 06:16
Do banks have to have majority control? Isn't this just traditional finance engaging in a disguised monopoly within Web3? Tech companies' involvement is also being sidelined, which sounds quite ironic.
View OriginalReply0
ser_aped.eth
· 01-09 08:30
Do banks need majority control? Here we go again, the old tricks of traditional finance—trying to choke tech companies.
View OriginalReply0
EyeOfTheTokenStorm
· 01-08 10:10
Another set of "balance plans"... Majority control by banks, isn't this essentially a form of monopoly? Tech companies will ultimately be trapped. Korea's approach is indeed sophisticated; on the surface open, but behind the scenes full of shackles.
Exchanges fined up to 10% of annual revenue? Now security truly becomes a matter of real money... But on the other hand, this is also a sign of bottoming out. Strict regulation often indicates increased market maturity. Looking at historical data, the 2017 wave was similar.
The question is, will this policy orientation accelerate the flow of funds toward centralization? The window for doing T might really be closing.
View OriginalReply0
GreenCandleCollector
· 01-08 10:09
Here comes another monopoly, and the banking elites must be thrilled. Tech companies are just the background, just listen.
View OriginalReply0
SnapshotBot
· 01-08 10:08
Here we go again, do banks have to hold the big share? Isn't this just traditional finance playing the gatekeeper in Web3... Tech companies' involvement is useless, in the end, the final say still remains in the hands of the banks.
View OriginalReply0
unrekt.eth
· 01-08 10:03
Here we go again, creating "balance." To put it simply, it's still the banks calling the shots.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerProfit
· 01-08 10:00
Another new regulation to cut leeks? Banks must have majority control, isn't that essentially a form of monopoly... What do tech companies have to do with this?
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketNoodler
· 01-08 09:56
Banks creating stablecoins? That's hilarious. This is the usual trick of traditional finance—looks open but actually just trapping you. Tech companies getting involved? What's the point? In the end, the power still remains in the hands of the banks. This rule design is brilliant—giving you hope just to kick you down again.
View OriginalReply0
ContractFreelancer
· 01-08 09:54
The banks are coming to harvest again, with tech companies just lending a hand. Now that's true "balance" haha
New regulations for Korean stablecoins: banks must have majority control, and exchanges face fines up to 10% of annual revenue
【ChainNews】South Korea’s stablecoin policy has new developments. According to the latest submitted amendment bill, the Korea Financial Services Commission (FSC) now supports the central bank’s plan—limiting the issuance rights of stablecoins to alliances led by banks with majority control.
What does this mean? Banks must hold the majority of shares, but tech companies also have a chance to participate—as long as they become the largest single shareholder and the banks maintain overall control. It sounds like a balance, giving traditional financial institutions a say while leaving room for technological innovation.
But that’s not all. The days for exchanges will become more stringent. The new regulations will raise standards for information technology stability, require mandatory compensation for damages caused by hacking attacks, and impose fines up to 10% of annual revenue. In other words, security vulnerabilities are no longer just technical issues but come with real financial costs.
The entry threshold for stablecoin issuers has also been set—at least 5 billion Korean won (about $3.7 million) in paid-in capital. As the market develops, this number may be increased.
Interestingly, the ruling party, financial regulators, and the central bank do not have entirely aligned views on this plan. Members of parliament are preparing a special working group to discuss alternative options. The final direction of the policy will depend on subsequent negotiations.