When AI GitHub repo metadata made a comeback, it flipped the whole game. Here's the thing—if you're thinking about jumping in, consider being a builder instead of a trader. Right now that coding skills are becoming more accessible than ever, the real advantage goes to devs who actually deploy.
Case in point: one developer pulled in 22k USD within just 3 hours purely from protocol fees. That's not trading gains—that's actual value creation. The fee structure rewards those shipping products over those just watching charts.
The shift is real. Deployment beats speculation when it comes to sustainable returns.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LiquidityHunter
· 01-11 07:47
3 hours 22,000? Need to dig into this protocol's fee structure. Is the liquidity depth abnormal... There might be arbitrage opportunities here.
View OriginalReply0
SmartContractPhobia
· 01-09 13:16
Builders are always winners, traders are just bagholders.
Really? 22,000 in 3 hours, why am I still fixing bugs?
Deployment is the key; those watching the K-line chart deserve to lose money.
That's true, but knowing is easy, doing is hard. Who doesn't want to launch a product quickly?
Coding skills have depreciated, but laziness will always appreciate.
The protocol fee structure has indeed changed the game; it wasn't this profitable before.
View OriginalReply0
CexIsBad
· 01-08 10:00
Builders will really win, traders lose every day
---
3 hours, 22,000—really intense. I said deployment is the way out
---
Is there still a chance to enter now? Feels like everyone has been swept away
---
Come on, are you serious this time? Not another wave of cutting leeks
---
Coding skills have a lower barrier to entry, but the gap in execution has widened
---
Fee structure design is really about screening true builders, no lie there
---
I'm still debating whether to learn coding or not. Looks like I really need to get moving
View OriginalReply0
SellTheBounce
· 01-08 09:54
It's the same story again... Making 22,000 in 3 hours? Just listen to it. There's always someone willing to take the bait at a lower price. Builders also need someone to buy in, but the question is who will take the final step.
View OriginalReply0
ConsensusDissenter
· 01-08 09:52
Here we go again with the builder savior theory... But to be honest, 22,000 in 3 hours? That number is just fucking outrageous. Can one in ten developers be this lucky? However, construction is indeed more solid than mere hype, there's no doubt about that.
When AI GitHub repo metadata made a comeback, it flipped the whole game. Here's the thing—if you're thinking about jumping in, consider being a builder instead of a trader. Right now that coding skills are becoming more accessible than ever, the real advantage goes to devs who actually deploy.
Case in point: one developer pulled in 22k USD within just 3 hours purely from protocol fees. That's not trading gains—that's actual value creation. The fee structure rewards those shipping products over those just watching charts.
The shift is real. Deployment beats speculation when it comes to sustainable returns.