2026-01-08 09:29:56

India's tax authorities recently brought up a difficult issue during the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Finance — tax tracking of crypto asset transactions is essentially a black hole.

Where exactly is the problem? Offshore exchanges, private key wallets, DeFi tools make taxable income almost invisible, and regulators have no way to track them. Plus, cross-border transactions involve multiple jurisdictions, which significantly increases the complexity. Some transactions cannot be reconstructed during tax assessments at all, as if they never happened.

Currently, India imposes a flat 30% tax on crypto gains, along with a 1% withholding tax on all transfers. It seems quite strict, but the problem is — this mechanism is riddled with loopholes in practice. Industry insiders generally believe that such a tax system faces fairness issues (large disparities in burden among different market participants) and feasibility issues (it’s simply impossible to enforce).

This reflects a bigger contradiction: regulators want to control risks but feel somewhat powerless in the face of the distributed nature of the crypto market. For exchanges and users, this also means that policy space remains a constant game of negotiation.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

8 Likes

Reward
8
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MEVvictim

· 01-10 19:12

The Indian tax authorities' 30% tax rate looks intimidating, but in reality, it's just a paper tiger that can't be tracked at all.

View OriginalReply0

HalfIsEmpty

· 01-09 14:31

India's 30% tax rate, just hearing about it makes you realize it's a paper tiger... In reality, you can't pay with many coins.

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketSurvivor

· 01-08 09:59

This is a typical case of "strict on paper, zero enforcement." The Indian tax authorities set a 30% rate, but how much can they actually collect? I bet five bucks it’s not more than 5%. The offshore wallet cross-border system itself has tracking limitations. Historically, during policy gaps, the market has always adapted this way—setting rules is easy, catching participants is hard. A 30% tax rate looks intimidating, but without tracking methods, it’s just a show. This game is far from over. The securities market experienced similar situations in earlier years, and in the end, it still relied on exchanges actively cooperating to plug loopholes. India still has a long way to go. --- No matter how strict the policy is written, without enforcement, it’s just blowing up fireworks. Exchanges still operate, users still transfer out. Regulatory agencies probably underestimated the decentralization of crypto this time. --- It seems like a big stick with 30%, but in reality, it’s just bluffing. Without data or tracking methods, even a high tax rate is just wishful thinking. That’s the key.

View OriginalReply0

DataBartender

· 01-08 09:57

Ha, India's 30% tax rate is basically a paper tiger; it can't really control the on-chain funds. --- Offshore + DeFi + private keys, how could regulators possibly catch up? That's too naive. --- It's another endless cycle of "I want to regulate you" and "You can't regulate me," a classic game theory. --- The bottleneck is always cross-chain and cross-border issues; no matter how a single country tries, it's futile. --- It's 2024, and people are still using traditional tax systems to overlay crypto; this mindset is fundamentally flawed. --- They promised a 30% transfer fee of 1%, but in reality, smart people pay nothing, which is hilarious. --- I can feel the regulators' sense of helplessness, but isn't this the cost of choosing a distributed system? --- A black hole? To them, it's a void; to users, it's paradise.

View OriginalReply0

rugpull_ptsd

· 01-08 09:54

Haha, really, India's tax system is a joke. The 30% tax rate sounds good on paper but is impossible to enforce. This is what Web3 should look like—regulation can never keep up with the speed of decentralization. So, private keys are the most powerful tax tool... Exchanges feel cornered, as compliance costs versus tax evasion benefits—who would still obediently pay taxes? Cross-border issues are definitely the regulatory Achilles' heel; offshore structures can be set up in minutes. The Indian government wants to control it but simply can't—this is called reality.

View OriginalReply0

DataOnlooker

· 01-08 09:47

Haha, okay, India's 30% tax rate looks intimidating, but in reality, it's just a paper tiger. --- Once you transfer funds on an offshore exchange, all records are gone. How can regulators do anything? There's nowhere to cry. --- That's why I've always said the most awesome thing about crypto is that the technology itself carries the gene of counteracting taxes. --- A 1% withholding tax sounds small, but the key is, how do they record the deduction if there's no record? That's hilarious. --- Distributed markets vs. centralized taxation—this showdown was decided right from the start. --- Wait, so law-abiding traders actually suffer because they can be tracked? That's a brilliant logic.

View OriginalReply0

GasGasGasBro

· 01-08 09:36

India's 30% tax rate looks intimidating, but the actual amount collected is probably less than a fraction of that. A black hole is a black hole; anyway, no one can find it.

View OriginalReply0

MoneyBurnerSociety

· 01-08 09:33

Indian Tax Authorities: We levy a 30% tax | Reality: Can't really catch us, this is my best field— the art of steady losses

View OriginalReply0