South Korea's stablecoin issuance plan has recently become a focal point. The Financial Services Commission has changed its stance and now supports the restrictive proposal put forward by the Bank of Korea — stablecoins can only be issued by conglomerates controlled by banks.
It sounds very strict, but the details are key. According to the upcoming amended bill submitted to Congress, banks must maintain majority control, ensuring the stability of the financial system. However, this does not completely exclude tech companies — they can become the single largest shareholders as long as their shares do not exceed those of the banks.
This balanced approach protects the voice of traditional finance while also allowing space for technological innovation. In addition, the bill imposes stricter IT security and risk control requirements on cryptocurrency exchanges. The entire plan reflects the regulators' efforts to promote the standardization of the stablecoin market while also trying to find a cooperative space between financial institutions and tech companies.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
23 Likes
Reward
23
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
P2ENotWorking
· 01-11 09:27
It's the old cliché of "balance," basically meaning banks want the big share.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCrybaby
· 01-11 01:21
Are banks going to control stablecoins? Isn't this just a way to prolong the life of traditional finance? Tech companies have become just workers.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-6bc33122
· 01-08 09:57
It's the same old "balance" game, honestly still the banks taking the biggest cut.
---
Having tech companies as the largest shareholders is pointless; their say is minimal.
---
South Korea's approach is interesting—can regulation and innovation truly work hand in hand? I remain skeptical.
---
Bank control = financial influence. The logic is sound, but is there really room for innovation or just a facade?
---
Blocking progress while offering rewards—classic "orderly advancement," right?
---
Once this bill is enacted, how will small stablecoin projects survive? They can only cling to the big players.
---
So ultimately, it's still the central bank that calls the shots; tech companies are just laborers.
View OriginalReply0
SandwichDetector
· 01-08 09:54
Another set of bank-preferred old tricks, tech companies will always be the workers' fate.
View OriginalReply0
SilentObserver
· 01-08 09:49
Banks must take the lead, and tech companies can only assist; I get this logic.
View OriginalReply0
Blockblind
· 01-08 09:48
It's the same old story where banks call the shots, and tech companies are mostly just the second fiddle...
View OriginalReply0
ser_ngmi
· 01-08 09:48
Is it another attempt to harvest the retail investors? Bank holdings are supposed to be stable? That's hilarious.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidatedTwice
· 01-08 09:45
It's always the bank folks calling the shots; tech companies can only play second fiddle forever.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCrier
· 01-08 09:41
It's the banks calling the shots again, while tech companies are just along for the ride.
South Korea's stablecoin issuance plan has recently become a focal point. The Financial Services Commission has changed its stance and now supports the restrictive proposal put forward by the Bank of Korea — stablecoins can only be issued by conglomerates controlled by banks.
It sounds very strict, but the details are key. According to the upcoming amended bill submitted to Congress, banks must maintain majority control, ensuring the stability of the financial system. However, this does not completely exclude tech companies — they can become the single largest shareholders as long as their shares do not exceed those of the banks.
This balanced approach protects the voice of traditional finance while also allowing space for technological innovation. In addition, the bill imposes stricter IT security and risk control requirements on cryptocurrency exchanges. The entire plan reflects the regulators' efforts to promote the standardization of the stablecoin market while also trying to find a cooperative space between financial institutions and tech companies.