2026-01-08 09:24:12

In the exploration of on-chain finance, there's an old problem that has yet to be solved: achieving true self-custody often sacrifices usability; wanting to be user-friendly in daily use can easily introduce custody risks at certain points. Most projects waver between these two extremes.

Recently, I saw Tria's transparency report, which details progress data and operational status, and it's worth paying attention to. The team's approach is very clear—redesign the product based on several principles: first, default to self-custody, and never give out users' private keys. This is not just a slogan but a constraint embedded in the product architecture.

They also shared their future planning directions in the report. This level of transparency itself demonstrates their attitude—not hiding things but allowing the community to see clearly how the product operates, where the risks are, and what the goals are. For users who want to truly control their assets, such projects are worth a deep dive. Of course, balancing self-custody and usability is never just a technical issue; the key is whether the team genuinely wants to solve it.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

YieldFarmRefugee

· 4h ago

Finally, someone is taking the private key matter seriously, not just paying lip service.

View OriginalReply0

MergeConflict

· 10h ago

The balance between self-custody and usability is indeed an eternal game, but Tria's approach to transparency reports is a bit different. Instead of those projects that constantly shout about security, incorporating private keys into the architecture for constraints is more convincing—this is the true meaning of "put your money where your mouth is." However, in the end, it still depends on the real user experience; otherwise, all the beautiful visions are pointless.

View OriginalReply0

MetaLord420

· 01-08 09:54

Self-custody vs. ease of use—this contradiction, to be honest, most projects are just theoretical. Tria's approach of integrating private keys into the architecture is somewhat interesting, but it still depends on whether they can truly improve the user experience later on; otherwise, transparency alone is meaningless.

View OriginalReply0

alpha_leaker

· 01-08 09:52

Self-custody and usability, this pair of rivals, finally someone is taking them seriously? Tria's transparency report this time is indeed different.

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketSurvivor

· 01-08 09:26

It's that old debate of self-custody vs. ease of use again. Can it really be broken? I'm a bit moved by Tria's transparency move, but we all know that ultimately, it's about execution. Not handing over the private key sounds great, but are users really willing to pay for that complexity? No matter how clearly the report is written, the key is how long the product can survive.

View OriginalReply0