Recently, I developed a strategy involving yield-bearing tokens. After testing for a period, I found that this approach can indeed carve out significant profit opportunities in the current crypto market. Essentially, it involves stacking Pendle's PT-USDe with the low-interest features of a lending protocol, creating a layered operation that generates triple yield streams, with annualized returns reaching up to 29.4%.



Let's clarify the core logic first. PT-USDe is fundamentally a yield rights split of Pendle protocol on USDe—separating the principal as a tradable asset. This token inherently has stable income properties; its market price is usually below face value, and as it approaches maturity, it gets closer to face value. Simply holding it yields an annualized return of about 10.4%.

My idea is to collateralize PT-USDe into a lending platform, borrow stablecoins at a very low interest rate (around 1%), and then invest the borrowed funds into yield-generating financial products (with approximately 20% annualized return). This stacking creates three layers of income.

Numbers speak most directly. Suppose you invest $10,000 principal. The yield from PT-USDe holdings is $1,040; with a 150% collateralization ratio, you can borrow $6,600 in stablecoins, with an annual borrowing cost of only $66; investing this $6,600 into a financial product can earn $1,320. Final calculation: 1,040 + 1,320 - 66 = $2,294 profit, which is an annualized return of 22.94%. Plus, with governance token incentives from the Pendle platform (which can boost the return up to 29.4%), the profit margin becomes quite attractive. Compared to just holding or a single strategy, the growth potential is significant.

Three key points to note in practical operation are worth emphasizing. First, choose PT-USDe with a 6-12 month maturity—this period tends to have moderate volatility and more stable returns. Second, don’t set the initial collateralization rate too tight; leave at least 180% safety buffer to prevent liquidation during market fluctuations. Third, regularly roll the yields back into the principal for reinvestment; over time, the compounding effect becomes especially pronounced.

Risks cannot be ignored either. Changes in interest rate environments will directly impact PT-USDe’s price movement—this inverse relationship could cause principal pressure during rate hikes. Additionally, lending platforms’ collateral rules are dynamically adjusting, so it’s essential to stay updated on official announcements and prepare for potential parameter changes in advance.

Overall, this combined strategy maximizes capital utilization to a very high level. It’s suitable for participants with some risk awareness who pursue higher yields. In the current market environment, such mechanisms are indeed worth tracking and deepening practice.
PENDLE-0,28%
USDE-0,01%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 10
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
HalfBuddhaMoneyvip
· 01-11 09:12
29.4% annualized return sounds great, but the liquidation risk is really hard to bear.
View OriginalReply0
Whale_Whisperervip
· 01-11 06:25
29.4% annualized sounds great, but liquidation risk is the real danger.
View OriginalReply0
PaperHandSistervip
· 01-10 20:42
29.4% annualized? Sounds like one of those seemingly attractive combined strategies... Can it really stay stable?
View OriginalReply0
WhaleInTrainingvip
· 01-10 09:05
29.4% annualized sounds tempting, but liquidation risk is the real killer. --- This move is indeed clever, but you need to figure out when the lending platform will cut parameters. --- 180% collateralization ratio? I think it should be more relaxed; market fluctuations can be tough. --- Compound interest sounds simple, but not many people actually stick with it. --- When the interest rate environment changes, the whole logic collapses; it feels like the risk is underestimated. --- Have you tried Pendle? It seems like the arbitrage window is very short. --- 22.94% is already quite high; is the extra governance token incentive a bit excessive? --- The key is whether the lending platform is stable; that's the real risk of a blow-up. --- I still think stacking triple yields is too complicated; if something goes wrong, none of the layers can save you. --- USDe itself carries risks, and adding three layers of leverage feels a bit too greedy.
View OriginalReply0
NFTArchaeologistvip
· 01-08 09:53
29.4% sounds very attractive, but what about the risks? The current interest rate environment can change at any moment.
View OriginalReply0
consensus_whisperervip
· 01-08 09:47
29.4% sounds very tempting, but what if the parameters are adjusted?
View OriginalReply0
MetaNeighborvip
· 01-08 09:47
29.4% annualized? Sounds good, but stacking these plays like a human pyramid also comes with serious risks.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityNinjavip
· 01-08 09:43
29.4% annualized sounds great, but if this wave of interest rates suddenly shifts, it will break immediately. Not many people dare to go all in.
View OriginalReply0
RektButAlivevip
· 01-08 09:41
29.4% annualized return sounds great, but I'm more concerned about liquidation risk...
View OriginalReply0
Rugman_Walkingvip
· 01-08 09:28
29.4% annualized? Sounds great, but somehow it feels a bit suspicious.
View OriginalReply0
View More
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)