2026-01-08 09:22:52

Small account gameplay has its nuances. Using 100U to interact with an emerging project can stack multiple layers of returns, and many people are already practicing this strategy.

Having tested with real money, the points earning situation is as follows: basic Swap operations, a trading volume of 100U yields about 30 points per round; after completing the 100U trading volume task, you can earn 200 points; if you create a liquidity pool with over 50U and then join the community Guild, you also get 200 points.

By stacking several channels, even small capital can generate a significant amount of points. For early ecosystem participants, this multi-dimensional incentive design is quite attractive.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

NewPumpamentals

· 01-11 01:45

Wow, this point stacking gameplay is quite competitive. I need to give it a try.

View OriginalReply0

SmartContractPlumber

· 01-10 17:30

This incentive design seems attractive, but you need to look into how the contract permissions are controlled. I have audited similar projects before, and bugs in the points distribution logic have led to double claims. Cases where users received 100U for free and ended up with 500U are not uncommon. Be cautious.

View OriginalReply0

MetaMisery

· 01-08 09:48

I've seen through this points stacking scheme a long time ago. To put it nicely, it's more money earned with less money invested. Really? Can 100U earn that many points? I feel like it's just a wool-harvesting gimmick. But on the other hand, early entry definitely has opportunities. It all depends on whether this project can hold up in the future.

View OriginalReply0

MemeKingNFT

· 01-08 09:44

It seems like simple point accumulation, but in fact it hides a market sentiment turning point. I've seen similar gameplay during the digital collectibles boom last year. Back then, it was also about stacking incentives like this. And the result? The entire ecosystem collapsed. Trying 100U for trial and error is acceptable, but don't be fooled by this "multi-dimensional" approach. On-chain data speaks for itself. Now everyone wants to attract small retail investors to boost data. What sounds good are early-stage dividends, but in reality? Bearish signals are everywhere. That said, during the bottoming phase, it's indeed appropriate to find such experimental fields. Just worried it might become the next hotbed for the mentality of new retail investors. Wait, is this Guild reliable?

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-c802f0e8

· 01-08 09:42

This strategy sounds good, but it depends on what the points can be exchanged for in the end. Hopefully, it's not just a bunch of worthless tokens.

View OriginalReply0