2026-01-08 09:20:29

A major exchange plans to delist certain spot trading pairs on January 9, 2026. These include trading pairs such as 1000 SATS/FDUSD, AEVO/BTC, EDEN/BNB, and others. Affected users can continue trading related tokens on other available trading pairs on the platform. It is recommended to plan your trading strategies in advance. Such adjustments are usually related to market liquidity, project development, or platform optimization strategies.

SATS-0,99%

AEVO-2,62%

BTC0,13%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ChainWatcher

· 01-09 23:02

Is it being delisted again? Who's going to take the fall this time... Is SATS really going to be withdrawn?

View OriginalReply0

DaoTherapy

· 01-09 04:06

Another trading pair has been delisted... This time I have to change the strategy again, so annoying.

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketBard

· 01-08 09:50

They're removing it again, and this time they're going to lose some transaction fees.

View OriginalReply0

LightningLady

· 01-08 09:46

Damn, are the trading pairs delisted again? These small coins should have been cleaned up a long time ago.

View OriginalReply0

WalletDetective

· 01-08 09:43

Is it going to be delisted again? This trading pair is moving faster than the project team.

View OriginalReply0

SmartContractPlumber

· 01-08 09:40

Delisting trading pairs with poor liquidity is quite normal. However, we need to check whether it involves permission control issues, as reentrancy vulnerabilities are most likely to occur during the exchange's contract upgrade process. There was a case where an exchange was exploited during the delisting process through a chain attack. A reminder to friends looking to buy the dip—make sure the security checks of the contract deployment are in place before taking action. Such adjustments usually indicate liquidity exhaustion, or it could be that the project team has hidden risks in permission configurations, and the platform is just trying to mitigate risks. Although it sounds grand, at its core, it's about removing trouble. We need to be smarter and not be fooled by the superficial "platform optimization."

View OriginalReply0