2026-01-08 09:00:20

#2026年比特币价格展望 In the crypto world, nine out of ten people lose money. Want to know why? Just one sentence—most people haven't learned how to make money while living, they spend all day dreaming of getting rich overnight.

I know a friend who started with 1200U and turned it into 36,000U in three months, never getting wiped out. His secret is a set of "counter-human" strategies, and I’ve been using the same approach to grow my small account to this size.

**First Layer: Learn to split your capital.**
Never go all-in on a single trade—that's the first deadly rule. Divide 1200U into three parts of 400U each:
- One part for quick in-and-out trades, focus on one trade per day, exit immediately once the target is hit, never chase after losses
- One part for swing trading, operate once every ten days or half a month, catching long and substantial trending markets
- One part for bottom-fishing, do not touch the market no matter how it moves—this is your safety fund

People who go all-in are not qualified to talk about profits because they get wiped out with a single plunge. The crypto market isn’t about who makes the most money, but about who survives the longest. Coins like $BROCCOLI714, $BONK can be played, but the key is having enough capital to stay in the game until you can play them.

**Second Layer: Don’t argue with sideways markets.**
80% of the market time is consolidation. If you trade every day during this period, you’ll only pay fees and suffer from slippage—nothing else. Wait until the trend is clear before acting—that’s smart. Don’t be greedy once you’re in; take 30% profit when you reach 20%, and leave the rest to continue trading. Experienced traders actually trade very infrequently—they either take a break or eat up a whole trend in one move.

**Third Layer: Set rules, abandon feelings.**
When your mindset is chaotic, your plan falls apart. Before each trade, set three ironclad rules:
- Stop loss at 2%, don’t hesitate once the level is hit, cut immediately
- When floating profit reaches 4%, cut half of your position and lock in some gains
- No adding to positions—over-adding makes you more vulnerable to being caught, and emotional trading will ruin your system

Stick to the rules, and the market will naturally give you positive feedback. Your funds will grow steadily according to logic, not swinging wildly with your emotions.

Opportunities are everywhere in the crypto space; what’s truly lacking is someone who can survive long enough to seize them. Are you ready to set rules for yourself?

BTC-0,18%

BONK-2,46%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

BlockchainFries

· 01-11 08:41

Really, going all-in with a full position is just giving away money. I've seen too many people like that. Exactly, but the execution is difficult... Most people's mentality still collapses. Splitting into three parts is okay, but I'm afraid they won't be able to resist going all in again. This is the core—living longer is a hundred times more important than earning quickly. Sideways trading is the self-cultivation of the leek, wasting fees and losing money. Once the rules are set, stick to them. Don't go against your own desires.

View OriginalReply0

SmartContractWorker

· 01-10 15:19

After watching so many times, I still can't understand why I always get stuck in sideways trading. Honestly, I've tried this split-position strategy, but I just can't execute it. As soon as I see market movement, I want to go all in. Is it true that this guy turned his account from zero to 36,000 in three months, or is it just another survivor bias story? A 2% stop loss sounds simple, but when that moment comes, my hands start to shake. In the crypto world, the saying "it's a contest of who survives longer" is harsh. I used to just not survive long.

View OriginalReply0

FlippedSignal

· 01-08 20:04

That's right, I was ruined by full-position all-in before. Now, holding three positions makes me feel much more comfortable. But I still won't follow the rules strictly—that's the truth. Moving 1200U to 36,000 sounds easy, but in practice, mindset is the biggest enemy. During sideways trading, I really should sleep, but I can never stay idle. I've heard this family division theory a hundred times, but I've never successfully implemented it. It seems simple, but it's really a matter of self-discipline, which 99% of people can't achieve. How to determine a clear trend? Isn't it still based on intuition? I tried this method; I made a huge profit in the first two weeks, but lost everything in the third week. Maybe the problem is me. A 2% stop-loss rule is too rigid. What do you do when the price drops and rises again in seconds? Adding to positions can really be deadly; I've been trapped too many times myself. It makes sense, but the difficulty of execution is off the charts. I need to lose a few more times to truly understand. Can I survive long with this method? It still feels like luck plays a big role.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoWageSlave

· 01-08 09:30

That's so true, it's all about living long enough. I used to go all-in with full positions too, and as a result, I got wiped out in one sudden drop. Only now do I realize that the strategy of dollar-cost averaging really saves lives. It looks simple, but executing it is all about human psychology. I'm still stubborn about not adding to my position; it's too easy to be driven by emotions. From 1200 to 36,000, just thinking about it is outrageous, but the logic does hold. Stop-loss is always the hardest part, especially when you see the numbers dropping. Wait, is this guy also playing BROCCOLI714? I saw someone in the group seems to have started around the same time.

View OriginalReply0

RugResistant

· 01-08 09:28

nah hold up, this reeks of survivorship bias... dude made 30x in 3 months? red flags detected fr fr. where's the risk analysis on $BROCCOLI714? sounds like a classic pump scheme setup tbh.

Reply0

PonziWhisperer

· 01-08 09:28

That's right, living longer is much more important than making quick profits. Indeed, those who go all-in haven't survived; I've seen too many cases. Not many people understand risk management; most are still dreaming of a big win. I'm also using this three-part method, which has definitely reduced psychological pressure. The key is discipline; I feel this is the most harmful thing.

View OriginalReply0

ImpermanentLossFan

· 01-08 09:28

This set of asset allocation is indeed excellent, but I still think most people simply can't execute it. Mindset is much harder than strategy. No matter how good the method is, it’s useless if you can't stick to the rules. I've seen too many cases. Full position trading is indeed damn risky; only by staying alive can you make money. That saying really hits home. Honestly, the hardest part is the stop-loss. Selling at just 2% loss—who can really do that? The life-saving money at the bottom is crucial; I just worry someone secretly goes all-in again. I have to admit, not trading during sideways markets—I've paid dearly for being careless before. You're right, in the crypto world, those who survive longer win. Short-term geniuses are just wasting time. But how was the figure of 36,000 calculated? Is it real or fake? I deeply understand the low-frequency trading; the less you trade, the more you tend to make money.

View OriginalReply0

SignatureLiquidator

· 01-08 09:02

It sounds reasonable, but truly persistent people are few and far between. Rules are easy to talk about, but as soon as you lose money, you forget everything. I have deep experience with the rule of adding positions; every time I want to gamble it all, I end up digging myself deeper. This logic really hits home; living long is the real key. The people who went all-in in one shot are probably all crying now. Splitting into three parts, in simple terms, is about risk management—simple but effective. Real experts trade so infrequently that it’s shocking, while we are busy messing around every day. A 2% stop-loss sounds strict, but it can really save your life. Human nature is too hard to overcome; that’s the biggest enemy. At least this article is honest, much more sincere than those signal providers.

View OriginalReply0

pumpamentalist

· 01-08 09:01

That's right, full positions are all cannon fodder. I've seen too many people go all-in and then get eliminated immediately. No rules means seeking death. I follow these three ironclad rules, and the most important one is stop-loss. Going from 1200 to 36,000 is indeed brutal, but the problem is most people simply can't execute it; they can't get past that mental barrier. The concept of position sizing sounds simple, but few can really stick to it. Living long is the key; those who chase quick profits are all dead. That's why retail investors always lose money—they know it in their heads but can't stop their hands. I've fallen into the trap of adding to positions; the more I added, the deeper I sank. I regret it now. Consolidation periods test human nature the most; 99% of people are just messing around during those times.

View OriginalReply0