2026-01-08 08:57:40

The Indian tax authorities recently raised a major challenge in the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Finance—tax regulation of cryptocurrency transactions. It sounds like a technical issue, but it actually reflects a problem that global regulators are struggling with.

The core issues are: the existence of offshore exchanges, private key wallets, and various DeFi tools make tracking taxable income extremely difficult. How to unify transaction records from Country A, cross-chain operations from Country B, and liquidity mining rewards from Country C into a single tax assessment? Cross-border transactions are inherently complex, and involving multiple jurisdictions makes enforcement even more difficult. Some transactions are nearly impossible to reconstruct under the current system.

India's current policy is to impose a flat 30% tax on cryptocurrency gains. The policy itself is clear, but the real challenge lies in enforcement—regulators need not only a policy framework but also effective tracking tools and cross-border cooperation mechanisms. This is why many countries are pushing to establish more comprehensive standards for cryptocurrency tax reporting.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

LoneValidator

· 01-11 05:05

India's 30% tax rate sounds intimidating, but the real problem is—they simply can't catch up, haha. It's a bit funny; regulatory authorities are still figuring out how to track, but we've already deployed distributed solutions. Offshore exchanges just run away in the blink of an eye. How do you collect this tax? Do you really have to station personnel for tracking? Basically, it's just old wine in new bottles. Traditional tax frameworks can't effectively clamp down on on-chain activities. As long as cross-chain transfers exist, there is no "effective tracking." Just hearing this shows how helpless they are. It seems global regulators need to completely change their approach, or all efforts will be in vain. No matter how strict this 30% policy becomes, with the private key in hand, law enforcement is just groping in the dark. Let's wait and see; in the end, it will still depend on exchanges to compromise.

View OriginalReply0

IronHeadMiner

· 01-11 00:19

30% tax rate? India is directly pushing us to the dead end. How to track cross-chain operations? Isn't this just making things difficult for people? There are a bunch of offshore exchanges. How do you plan to investigate? With the private key in hand, I hold the world. What are the tax authorities thinking? This policy framework looks clear, but in execution, it's full of loopholes. Regulation will never keep up with technology, brothers. Looking for a needle in a haystack—at this level, you still want to regulate crypto?

View OriginalReply0

OfflineValidator

· 01-09 15:18

India's 30% tax rate looks harsh, but how much actual profit can you really chase? Offshore exchanges are basically untraceable. As for cross-chain mining, I don't think anyone can track it clearly... it all depends on voluntary reporting. A 30% cut directly, this tax rate is considered harsh worldwide, but it depends on how it's enforced. Technical tracking can never keep up; regulators are overthinking it. With the private key in hand, who knows where you're conducting transactions... that's the true essence of crypto. Cross-jurisdictional, no one can truly control it; India's system is destined to be just a show. DeFi stuff, it's on-chain but no one knows who is who, so how can effective taxation be possible?

View OriginalReply0

WhaleMistaker

· 01-08 09:27

India is going to charge 30%? Haha, now what to do about the trading income Centralized exchanges can't do anything; decentralization is the way to go 30% is too harsh, no wonder they can't track it down. Who would willingly report it? With more cross-chain operations, on-chain data is damn hard to understand. Good luck to the tax authorities That's why I've always said DeFi is the most lucrative. Let them chase after it

View OriginalReply0

ETHReserveBank

· 01-08 09:27

30% tax rate directly cuts hands? India is trying to force everyone to go on-chain for privacy --- Offshore exchanges, private key wallets... Basically, regulations can't keep up, and the policy looks good on paper but haha in execution --- How to check cross-chain and cross-border profits? Dream on, unless there's truly on-chain transparency one day --- This is the same worldwide, regulation is always a step behind, just stay one step ahead --- 30% is really harsh, is this pushing retail investors into DeFi? --- With the private key in hand, I own the world. What will tax authorities do? Laugh out loud --- Interestingly, the stricter the policy enforcement, the harder it is, which instead gives smart people arbitrage opportunities --- We don't support tax evasion, but this policy is indeed too crude, not considering the complexity on the chain

View OriginalReply0

ImpermanentPhobia

· 01-08 09:20

30% tax rate? Laughable, isn't this just disguised suppression? --- Offshore wallets disappear in the blink of an eye, how to chase... Regulators are being too naive. --- India's move is good, but if truly implemented, it will be a disaster. Who can handle cross-chain? --- Basically, it's because they can't catch us, so they come up with these policies just for show. --- How do you calculate income from liquidity mining? Does the code even matter? --- They're about to cut into our profits again, but there should indeed be standards. --- It's the era of explosive growth in DeFi, sticking to traditional tax frameworks is really tough. --- 30% is indeed harsh, but big overseas players have probably already left.

View OriginalReply0

WagmiOrRekt

· 01-08 09:18

30% tax rate? The Indian government is probably overthinking it. Isn't this just encouraging everyone to use hidden accounts? On-chain transactions are so transparent, yet they still can't catch up? They really should reflect on their technical capabilities. Cross-chain operations just leave people confused. The problem isn't with us; they simply haven't done their homework. DeFi is so wild; how can there be a one-size-fits-all regulation... Still too naive. The existence of offshore exchanges is the answer. Policies can't keep up with the pace of reality. This 30% is probably just a scare tactic for small investors; big players have long figured out how to evade it. India's approach is a bit outdated, still using traditional tax logic to play Web3.

View OriginalReply0

ProveMyZK

· 01-08 09:16

India's 30% tax rate sounds intimidating, but in reality, you probably can't even catch up haha --- How to declare cross-chain mining income? That's the real challenge --- A bunch of offshore exchanges, regulatory authorities trying to control is just wishful thinking --- Now it's all about global tax tracking, the privacy advantages of Web3 have become a "problem" --- Holding the private key means I control everything, but tax authorities want a share too? --- A 30% tax rate is really harsh, luckily I just entertain myself on-chain haha --- Countries pushing standards together? Feels like sooner or later, we'll need an on-chain tax reporting system --- The transaction trails of countries A, B, and C—they can't even imagine all of them --- India dares to be the first to try, while other countries are still researching

View OriginalReply0

ApyWhisperer

· 01-08 09:11

Haha, okay, a 30% tax rate? Do you really think everyone will report it honestly? --- Once an offshore wallet makes a transfer, regulatory authorities have no way to intervene. Same old trick. --- Compliance is easy to talk about, but when it comes to tracking private key wallets, everyone is completely stumped. --- India's move is trying to learn from other countries, but they find themselves stuck at the implementation level. --- Cross-chain and cross-border operations involve a set of procedures. How do you expect them to do the accounting? That’s the core issue. --- Now it's a race to see who can run faster—policy implementation or finding loopholes. --- The whole world is pondering this matter. Let’s see who breaks the deadlock first.

View OriginalReply0