2026-01-08 08:33:37

A single order from the United States has shaken the global diplomatic community.

The Trump administration has ordered the withdrawal from 66 international organizations—including 31 UN agencies and 35 other international organizations. The White House's statement is straightforward: these organizations "no longer serve American interests" and "promote radical climate policies."

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

21 Likes

Reward
21
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

not_your_keys

· 01-09 19:25

Really, coming with this again? The US says no to playing, and who gave you the courage? --- 66 organizations withdraw at once, this move is pretty ruthless. --- Aggressive climate policies? Buddy, your statement is really bold. --- Wait, does withdrawing like this really have no aftereffects? --- It's again about利益优先, international organizations just do their own thing. --- Laughing out loud, "not serving US interests" then withdraw, what about others? --- This time, it might cause international trouble. --- So now the global order depends on who has the bigger fist?

View OriginalReply0

WenAirdrop

· 01-09 05:22

The US is once again playing unilateralism, and this time it's really aggressive. Exiting 66 international organizations? Just throwing multilateralism into the trash. Climate policies are radical... Basically, they just don't want to spend money. The international order needs to be reshaped, everyone.

View OriginalReply0

DefiPlaybook

· 01-09 03:26

This wave of the US withdrawal play, to put it simply, is unilateral liquidity mining that directly drains the global governance TVL. But to be fair, climate policies do resemble those high-APY scams—just slogans without real implementation. Let's wait and see what happens next. This kind of "re-negotiation" tactic has been seen too many times in crypto, and in the end, usually no one makes any profit. [Dog head]

View OriginalReply0

ChainSpy

· 01-08 08:55

Really? They're causing trouble again, no way The US just wants to play alone, no wonder the crypto circle is all hiding This move is outrageous, is globalization doomed? Waiting to see the follow-up, it will definitely be a reverse positive for certain coins

View OriginalReply0

TideReceder

· 01-08 08:54

Now it's really going solo, the US says break up and break up The traditional international order is being rewritten, that's interesting Withdrawing from UN agencies? This script is too hardcore The US can do whatever it wants, other countries also have to adapt Disobedience to climate policies and being kicked out? So as long as you have money, you can be this willful Multipolarity is really here, who still insists on clinging to the US's thigh

View OriginalReply0

NeonCollector

· 01-08 08:54

The US has really started playing the "one-man game," and this move is quite ruthless. What will happen to Web3? With so many international organizations withdrawing, will regulation become even more chaotic? Just withdraw then. Anyway, it's a situation where everyone acts independently. The climate policy sounds good, but it's really about prioritizing interests. Now global governance is truly about to be reshuffled. But by the way, how do you see the impact of this on the blockchain ecosystem? Could it actually create more opportunities for decentralization? I can't quite understand what this move is really aiming for. What is the US betting on here?

View OriginalReply0

POAPlectionist

· 01-08 08:49

Coming with the same routine again? The US withdrawing from the group has become a regular operation, just like having a meal. Climate policy is just an excuse; frankly, it's driven by interests, nothing surprising. These UN organizations are already outdated; rather than being expelled, they should have been reformed long ago. Now the global order will need to be reorganized, and Web3 projects will have new topics to discuss. The real power game is just beginning; let's see who can fill this gap.

View OriginalReply0

SwapWhisperer

· 01-08 08:35

This scene is truly amazing, the United States is directly throwing a tantrum. Recalling the previous "America First" promises, this time they are really playing hardball. Aggressive climate policies? Honestly, they just don't want to be constrained. It seems the game of international organizations is about to be reshuffled. Quit 66? That's really bold. Daring to confront the United Nations, this US government is indeed a bit ruthless. Waiting to see Europe's reaction, they definitely won't sit still. It feels like pressing the pause button on globalization. The Web3 community needs to be cautious, as policy changes at the national level might have an impact. How can other countries follow this "America First" approach?

View OriginalReply0

TestnetNomad

· 01-08 08:33

Oh my god, is the US really going to act unilaterally? Withdrawing from 66 international organizations, are they planning to do it themselves? Wait, here comes the climate policy again, such a cliché. America's interests come first, but what about others... Will this pace really lead to a complete overhaul of the international order? It's hard to imagine, one person dropping so many cards in the game. What does the Web3 community think about this? Has the era of decentralization arrived? Haha. It feels like the world is going to become more fragmented. But by the way, does this have any relation to the crypto market? Has anyone analyzed this? Other countries are definitely planning countermeasures for this move.

View OriginalReply0