There is an old problem in the DAO community—slow proposal processes, low execution efficiency, and a continuous decline in community participation. The lively discussions often end up being dominated by big players, while ordinary token holders gradually lose interest.
Recently, some new governance models are attempting to improve this dilemma. By directly linking on-chain voting with funding pools, proposals move straight from discussion to execution, compressing the process to an average of 48 hours. This seemingly simple change actually means that community decisions can receive immediate feedback—submit a proposal over the weekend, and funds on the chain start flowing by Monday. This visible cause-and-effect relationship can significantly boost participation enthusiasm.
Substantive adjustments have also been made to the incentive layer. The community reward pool has reached around 500,000 USDC, with monthly stable returns distributed based on token holdings and participation levels. This is not an illusory vision but a real monetary reward mechanism, transforming governance participation from an idealistic pursuit to a利益-driven activity.
Technologically, a multi-signature wallet combined with on-chain automated scripts is used to reduce human intervention and increase transparency and security. Cross-chain governance functionality is about to go live, expected to improve asset dispatch efficiency by approximately 30%-40%.
From an investor’s perspective, these projects have several stable characteristics: high execution efficiency, clear incentive mechanisms, and solid technical foundations. During periods when market attention is not fully focused, such assets are relatively easier to identify opportunities. Once they truly become popular, there may only be chasing the trend left.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
20 Likes
Reward
20
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BlockchainBouncer
· 01-09 06:45
Execute within 48 hours? If it really materializes, I would believe it. I've heard too many promises before.
View OriginalReply0
SnapshotDayLaborer
· 01-08 12:56
48-hour execution? Sounds good but how do we guarantee it's not just going through the motions...
View OriginalReply0
RunWhenCut
· 01-08 09:01
48-hour execution? Sounds great in theory, but in reality it's still controlled by the same people. Same old wine in new bottles.
---
500K USDC reward pool... feels like just numbers on paper. When it comes time to actually distribute funds, there will be all sorts of conditions attached.
---
Nice words, but the key question is whether whales can actually be constrained. Otherwise it's just old tricks in new packaging.
---
On-chain automated execution scripts are interesting, but are the multisig wallet folks trustworthy?
---
Wait, is this cross-chain governance even live yet? Or is it just another PowerPoint promise?
---
Participation increase = incentive boost, the logic checks out. Just worried the funding will dry up and everything goes cold again.
---
30%-40% efficiency improvement sounds solid, but these kinds of projections are usually optimistic estimates, right?
View OriginalReply0
OfflineNewbie
· 01-08 08:59
Execute within 48 hours; this speed really packs a punch. But for that pool with 500,000 USDC, how much can an average person still get?
View OriginalReply0
New_Ser_Ngmi
· 01-08 08:39
48-hour execution? Sounds good, but the real question is whether that 500K USDC can actually be distributed fairly, or if it becomes another feast for the whales.
There is an old problem in the DAO community—slow proposal processes, low execution efficiency, and a continuous decline in community participation. The lively discussions often end up being dominated by big players, while ordinary token holders gradually lose interest.
Recently, some new governance models are attempting to improve this dilemma. By directly linking on-chain voting with funding pools, proposals move straight from discussion to execution, compressing the process to an average of 48 hours. This seemingly simple change actually means that community decisions can receive immediate feedback—submit a proposal over the weekend, and funds on the chain start flowing by Monday. This visible cause-and-effect relationship can significantly boost participation enthusiasm.
Substantive adjustments have also been made to the incentive layer. The community reward pool has reached around 500,000 USDC, with monthly stable returns distributed based on token holdings and participation levels. This is not an illusory vision but a real monetary reward mechanism, transforming governance participation from an idealistic pursuit to a利益-driven activity.
Technologically, a multi-signature wallet combined with on-chain automated scripts is used to reduce human intervention and increase transparency and security. Cross-chain governance functionality is about to go live, expected to improve asset dispatch efficiency by approximately 30%-40%.
From an investor’s perspective, these projects have several stable characteristics: high execution efficiency, clear incentive mechanisms, and solid technical foundations. During periods when market attention is not fully focused, such assets are relatively easier to identify opportunities. Once they truly become popular, there may only be chasing the trend left.