2026-01-08 08:25:52

Many players in the RWA track speak nicely, but it's mostly just storytelling and hype around concepts; few are actually doing real work. There's a project that takes a different approach—it doesn't rush to adopt complicated explanations but instead focuses on solidifying the fundamentals: starting with the authenticity of assets, repeatedly verifying the reasonableness of the liquidation mechanism, and continuously adjusting and testing the long-term sustainable operation model.

The current market sentiment is also changing; relying solely on high APY is no longer enough to persuade people. Users are becoming more rational, looking at whether the project can truly survive and whether the model can withstand scrutiny. This pragmatic attitude may actually be more likely to earn trust than those beautifully packaged narratives.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MemeKingNFT

· 01-10 15:20

Well said, this is exactly what I want to see. Those RWA projects before were all storytellers; I've grown tired of them long ago. Those who truly do solid work are actually more likely to be drowned out by the noise. This project has been carefully refined step by step in terms of asset authenticity and liquidation mechanisms, and it really has some substance. Market education has been sufficiently thorough, and those still relying on high APY to fool people should basically be done for. On-chain data doesn't lie.

View OriginalReply0

MoodFollowsPrice

· 01-10 09:27

Really, anyone still hyping high APY should wake up now Frankly, it still comes down to fundamentals, which is the key to lasting success Anyone can tell stories, but the crucial thing is whether the data can support it Finally, there are projects that are willing to work steadily and practically For RWA to truly take off, liquidation mechanisms and asset transparency are the key Investors are no longer fools, and those old tricks should be phased out Asset authenticity is indeed a hard indicator; it can't be faked There are too many promoting concepts daily, but only a handful have truly implemented workable models

View OriginalReply0

MeaninglessApe

· 01-10 07:35

Finally, someone is getting things done, but why are there so few projects like this? It's better to do than just talk about it. I really respect the repeated testing of the liquidation mechanism. Honestly, the high APY approach is outdated. Who still believes in that? This is the right way to open up, but unfortunately most are still just talking stories. When users become rational, the project is actually at a loss. It's really difficult.

View OriginalReply0

DAOdreamer

· 01-08 08:55

Really, right now the RWA track is full of PPT projects, all talk but no substance when you check the books. This kind of honest, foundational work is actually quite rare. --- After experiencing several crashes, everyone has become smarter. Just hyping APY can't fool anyone. Surviving is more important than anything. --- Wow, finally someone is not treating RWA as a pyramid scheme. Starting with verifying asset authenticity—that's the real deal. --- Repeated testing of the liquidation mechanism sounds troublesome, but it's definitely more reliable than air coins. Projects like this are necessary. --- I just want to ask those who tell stories all day—if the model can't stand scrutiny, how do they dare to raise funds? What's going on? --- Practicality wins trust, there's nothing wrong with that. The market is really changing, and the retail investors are no longer fools.

View OriginalReply0

GameFiCritic

· 01-08 08:55

Finally, someone has figured out RWA; not all projects rely on storytelling. I value the repeatedly validated liquidation mechanism; this is the key indicator of how long it can survive.

View OriginalReply0

ImpermanentSage

· 01-08 08:52

Finally, someone is really getting down to work, much better than those talkers. Exactly, the high APY approach has been played out long ago. Now it's about who can survive until next year. This is the proper way a serious business should look—no pretenses, no hype. RWA currently lacks projects that quietly make big money. While other projects are still telling stories, they are already building houses.

View OriginalReply0

FreeMinter

· 01-08 08:43

Someone finally dares to tell the truth. Most RWA projects are just storytelling with a shell, lacking real strength. Well said. Boasting has truly become outdated these days. Doing solid work is the real way to go. The high APY approach has been overused for a long time. Who still believes in it now? It depends on how long the project can survive. Projects that can't withstand scrutiny will eventually fail. That's the lesson. Pragmatic projects are actually more scarce and therefore more worth paying attention to. Projects that rely on liquidation mechanisms and asset authenticity are indeed more reassuring. I’d like to see more projects that don’t boast and are willing to focus on refining their work. The market is finally starting to filter out players with real strength.

View OriginalReply0

BlockTalk

· 01-08 08:40

Finally, I see someone explaining RWA thoroughly, not just shouting slogans. Such projects are indeed rare; most are still just storytelling. The era of high APY is over; now it's really about real strength. Whether the model can stand firm—that's the key.

View OriginalReply0