2026-01-08 08:24:54

Honestly, dev token lockups should be standard practice. Period.

If you're building something with real tech or compelling tokenomics, prove it. Lock those tokens, ship some demos, push regular updates—that's literally it. Why's this so hard to get people to understand?

Every day it's the same conversation: devs sitting on unlocked supplies while talking about their "revolutionary" project. You know what actually builds trust? Skin in the game. Tangible commitments.

The ones truly worth watching? They're already doing this. Sub-10K market cap, legitimate roadmap, tokens locked—these are the actual signal. Everything else is just noise.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

24 Likes

Reward
24
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

LongTermDreamer

· 01-11 03:30

Locking assets, this should have been done three years ago. It's a bit late to start talking about it now.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidationWizard

· 01-10 21:06

Traders have all played out, still relying on locking positions to speak.

View OriginalReply0

FalseProfitProphet

· 01-08 08:55

That's right, but the truly locked projects are scarce. --- Same old talk, I just want to ask how many devs really dare to lock? --- There's too much noise, the signal is buried in the trash heap. --- Skin in the game is indeed a sieve; those who can hold up are basically not scammers. --- Nine out of ten projects hype, but none are truly genuine. --- I agree, but the reality is most don't even have a demo. --- Roadmaps all look the same; the difference is whether they lock or not. --- Every day someone says there will be a revolution, but accounts are emptied just as quickly. --- That's why I only work with sub-cap projects; at least there's a sense of hunger.

View OriginalReply0

GasWaster