2026-01-08 08:24:05

The name of a project often determines how far it can go. Naming is like setting the ceiling for the future; breaking through this limit is very difficult.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

8 Likes

Reward
8
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MidnightGenesis

· 01-10 19:29

On-chain data shows that, historically, projects that have changed their names have no significant correlation between contract change times and market cap growth... From the code perspective, the name itself has never been the limiting factor for projects.

View OriginalReply0

QuietlyStaking

· 01-09 17:40

Names are indeed important, but team strength also matters... Who would have believed back then that a tacky name like Shib could rise?

View OriginalReply0

PerpetualLonger

· 01-09 00:20

Name? Bro, I have a say in this matter. Naming is indeed important, but the ceiling has never been determined by the name; it's our belief that sets the limit. Look at those projects with average names—adding positions still led to growth. This will be the last time I say this: solid fundamentals are the real breakthrough for the ceiling, and the name is just an excuse to get in, understand?

View OriginalReply0

WhaleWatcher

· 01-08 08:54

Is a name really that absolute? It feels like nonsense... Just look at those projects that changed their names and still made a comeback.

View OriginalReply0

GamefiHarvester

· 01-08 08:47

A name is just a facade; what's really important is having a solid product to support it. Otherwise, no matter how good the name sounds, it's all in vain.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropChaser

· 01-08 08:44

A name can indeed determine the pattern, but more than the name, I'm more concerned about whether I can push the coin out.

View OriginalReply0

SadMoneyMeow

· 01-08 08:39

Names are indeed important, but I think what's more crucial is whether the project itself has substance. The name godaddy sounds just so-so, but they still do very well.

View OriginalReply0

MainnetDelayedAgain

· 01-08 08:33

Does a name determine the ceiling? According to the database, many projects with lousy names are still doing well. On the other hand, those that put a lot of effort into naming have had their delay notices almost fermenting for two years.

View OriginalReply0