2026-01-08 08:23:44

The Xuanwu trading system has new developments. Recently, an upgraded version of the Kunpeng strategy was launched, named Kunpeng Eagle Eye, and many traders have already started paying attention to this new plan.

What exactly are the differences between the two versions? The original Kunpeng and Kunpeng Eagle Eye use the same signal sources, but their actual trading performance varies significantly. Kunpeng Eagle Eye tends to have higher win rates and profits on days without large trending markets. However, what is the cost? Once the market starts trending strongly in one direction, during an upward move, Kunpeng Eagle Eye can only achieve about 35% of the original Kunpeng's returns. In simple terms, one is more short-term profit-taking, while the other focuses on a larger macro pattern.

The trading logic of Kunpeng Eagle Eye is actually not complicated:

The entry signals remain the same as before, no change needed. The initial position size also remains unchanged, and the stop-loss and trailing stop logic stay the same. The difference begins with adding positions — the price gap for adding is changed to 0.8 times (if your stop-loss is 1 dollar, you add when it rises by 0.8; if the stop-loss is 1.5, you add when it rises by 1.2).

Position allocation is as follows: 1x for the main position, 0.6x for the second, and 0.4x for the third. For example, if the main position is 1000U, then it’s divided into 1000U, 600U, and 400U.

What about profit-taking? You only start exiting after the third position is fully added. The exit target is 1.5 times the profit of the main position's stop-loss amount, and half of the position is closed. For example, if the main position was originally set to lose 100U, then when the three positions are fully added and reach a profit of 150U, half is closed. The remaining half is handled the same as the original Kunpeng — either by EMA or by the entry price of the second position.

The key point is that both versions will be maintained simultaneously; they are not mutually exclusive. Those who prefer waiting for big trends and chasing huge profits should use the original Kunpeng, while those who want to earn steadily in daily trading should use Kunpeng Eagle Eye. The signal sources are the same; the choice is up to you.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MemeEchoer

· 01-11 06:08

Market fluctuations are best exploited with Eagle Eye for quick profits, and when the market is trending, switch back to the original version to make a move. This operational logic is indeed clever. Short-term stability and long-term high profits cannot be achieved simultaneously; the dilemma of choosing between the two has been solved. The spacing between additional positions has been reduced to 0.8 times, with three-position allocations of 1-0.6-0.4. Risk control has indeed become more meticulous. However, the real test is still execution discipline; even the best signals are useless if no one follows them.

View OriginalReply0

FreeRider

· 01-10 23:06

It seems to be that kind of "fish and bear's paw" dilemma again—stability and high returns really can't be achieved at the same time.

View OriginalReply0

VitalikFanboy42

· 01-10 11:42

0.8x Position Increase Interval? This guy wants to be steady, but I'm a bit hesitant to take only 35% in a one-sided market. Xuanwu's method is pretty good, you can choose between fish and bear paw separately, but the key is whether you're greedy or not. The signals for this chart are all the same, just changed the position configuration. Feels a bit fishy? The core logic is still the same. Short-term profit-taking vs. a super big pattern, just listening makes me want to take it all... but unfortunately, there's no free lunch in the world. Position increase has been changed, take-profit has also been adjusted. The name Kunpeng Eagle Eye is quite fitting. It seems to be for squeezing profits during regular consolidation, but I still think the original version is more powerful. Is such a position allocation really stable? Could it just be spreading out the risk without reducing it? It's still about synchronized retention, not replacement... Xuanwu really knows how to play, wanting both X and Y, right? I'll run some backtests on the data first, just listening to the logic isn't enough, everyone.

View OriginalReply0

SchroedingerGas

· 01-10 11:31

To be honest, the 0.8x position increase interval is a bit conservative. It can be stable during sideways markets, but only 35% profit during a big rally? That trade-off is a bit harsh.

View OriginalReply0

SerumSurfer

· 01-08 08:53

Increasing the position size by 0.8x is indeed a bit aggressive. Usually stable, but during a major market downturn shrinking to 35%, is this buy and sell strategy worth it?

View OriginalReply0

JustHereForAirdrops

· 01-08 08:53

Wait, is this 0.8x position increase interval serious? Feels too tight. --- Eagle Eye is a magic tool for short-term bottom fishing, but when a big trend comes, you'll be directly pressed to the ground and rubbed. --- Another "stable profit" plan, just listen and don't really believe it. --- Position allocation 1:0.6:0.4, interesting, but the key still depends on market temperament. --- 35% return? I feel like this trade-off isn't worth it. --- Basically, it's a multiple-choice question: either eat eggs or have steak. This system is quite honest. --- The logic for adding positions involves a bunch of numbers, but in the end, it still depends on discipline in execution. --- Keeping two versions synchronized is pretty good; anyway, they are the same signal source, just choose yourself.

View OriginalReply0

NullWhisperer

· 01-08 08:51

so basically they're trading the upside for consistency... 35% in moonshots vs steady gains on sideways action. interesting tradeoff, technically speaking.

Reply0

SerumSqueezer

· 01-08 08:46

To be honest, short-term stability and long-term huge profits really can't be achieved simultaneously. The 35% profit cap of this Eagle Eye version is a bit harsh, but usually, you can indeed earn passively.

View OriginalReply0

PrivacyMaximalist

· 01-08 08:44

Is it the same setup again, claiming an upgrade just because the signal source is the same? Honestly, Eagle Eye is designed for intraday scalpers. When a major market move comes, it directly cuts 35% of the profits. I still prefer the original version, betting on that one explosive wave. Increasing the position spacing to 0.8 times to get more gains? Sounds like risk transfer. Short-term stability for long-term ceiling. It's a typical trade-off between fish and bear's paw, nothing new.

View OriginalReply0

ChainSherlockGirl

· 01-08 08:27

Basically, it's a choice between stability vs. volatility—see who can resist the temptation of a major market move.

View OriginalReply0