In the past 24 hours, the TRON network has seen $1.4 billion in stablecoin inflows. This is not a random event but a natural result of technical fundamentals.
According to on-chain data tracking, the reason for this influx is simple—TRON's DPoS consensus mechanism makes it inherently suitable for large-scale stablecoin operations. High throughput means it can easily handle massive transfers, and transaction fees are almost negligible, which is a key advantage for stablecoin minting and circulation.
Compared to other mainstream networks, the situation becomes even clearer. Ethereum, although with a mature ecosystem, has Gas fees often costing dozens of dollars, making transfer costs uneconomical for stablecoin transactions. Solana, while boasting high speed, frequently faces network stability issues and congestion. TRON, on the other hand, has found a balance between cost and stability—precisely what stablecoin users care about most.
This influx data indicates a trend: the market is voting with its funds, choosing infrastructure that truly suits payments and transfers. For the future application scenarios of stablecoins, this is an interesting signal.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
21 Likes
Reward
21
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
rekt_but_vibing
· 01-09 22:24
Tron is showing off its muscles again, this time backed by hard data. I’m convinced.
---
Honestly, stablecoins should either be cheap or stable; Tron wants both.
---
Wait, is $1.4 billion inflow enough to say it’s inevitable? I feel like it’s just another prelude to a wave of profit-taking.
---
The Solana network is down again, haha. ETH’s gas fees are sky-high. Tron definitely caught a good deal.
---
Funding votes are real, but the ecosystem still lags far behind ETH. What can cheapness really buy?
---
Is this the future of Web3 payments? Feels too early to say.
---
Alright, I admit Tron wins in practicality, but don’t hype it up as the next Ethereum.
View OriginalReply0
RumbleValidator
· 01-08 08:53
1.4 billion dollars flowing into TRON, simply put, is an inevitable result of DPoS validation nodes outperforming other chains in stability, with efficiency standing right here.
View OriginalReply0
RuntimeError
· 01-08 08:52
Tron’s move this time is really aggressive, the fees are almost nonexistent—truly impressive... But with over 1.4 billion rushing in all at once, could it be that some big institution is hoarding?
---
Sol always had issues before, this time Tron taking advantage of the opportunity makes sense.
---
Wait, is this the future of stablecoins? Then how is ETH going to survive...
---
The underlying infrastructure is the key, right? The market won't deceive us.
---
Brothers, Tron is about to turn things around and sing a new song...
---
By the way, with these 1.4 billion coming in, when will it actually be used? Or is it just a capital game?
---
Finally, someone sees through it—why is Tron’s low fee advantage still mocked?
---
Feeling a bit anxious—are large inflows a good sign or a warning of a crash...
View OriginalReply0
notSatoshi1971
· 01-08 08:51
TRON's recent bloodsucking is indeed fierce, but to be honest, it's all about the cost advantage. Ethereum's gas fees have discouraged a lot of people.
View OriginalReply0
All-InQueen
· 01-08 08:47
TRON has really taken off this time, with Gas fees almost zero—this is amazing. No wonder so much money is pouring in.
ETH's transaction fees of around a few dozen dollars are indeed a deterrent. Stablecoins still need to be cheap.
The Sol network's instability is well known; TRX is still more reliable.
The statement about funding voting is spot on; the market is the most honest.
In the past 24 hours, the TRON network has seen $1.4 billion in stablecoin inflows. This is not a random event but a natural result of technical fundamentals.
According to on-chain data tracking, the reason for this influx is simple—TRON's DPoS consensus mechanism makes it inherently suitable for large-scale stablecoin operations. High throughput means it can easily handle massive transfers, and transaction fees are almost negligible, which is a key advantage for stablecoin minting and circulation.
Compared to other mainstream networks, the situation becomes even clearer. Ethereum, although with a mature ecosystem, has Gas fees often costing dozens of dollars, making transfer costs uneconomical for stablecoin transactions. Solana, while boasting high speed, frequently faces network stability issues and congestion. TRON, on the other hand, has found a balance between cost and stability—precisely what stablecoin users care about most.
This influx data indicates a trend: the market is voting with its funds, choosing infrastructure that truly suits payments and transfers. For the future application scenarios of stablecoins, this is an interesting signal.