In just three years, Alphabet and Meta have shattered records that haven't been touched since the dot-com era—posting a combined 184% sector rally. This isn't just a stock market blip. It's a fundamental shift in how capital flows through the market.
What makes this notable? These aren't speculative startups anymore. They're the infrastructure players of the digital age, and their recovery past historical peaks suggests something deeper about market psychology and investor confidence in tech-driven growth.
For anyone tracking macro trends, this matters. When traditional tech heavyweights start outperforming legacy records, it often signals broader cycles in risk appetite, capital allocation, and how investors reassess value across asset classes.
The question becomes: where does this momentum go next? And more importantly for portfolio strategists—what does a 184% three-year rally tell us about where the market thinks returns come from in the next cycle?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
18 Likes
Reward
18
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ShamedApeSeller
· 01-11 07:42
184%... Just thinking about it makes me dizzy. These two giants really revitalized the entire narrative, and it feels like all the money is pouring into tech.
Can it stop rising already? I'm about to get liquidated on my shorts haha.
To put it simply, capital is playing an emotional game. What will support the next cycle? If the AI bubble can't inflate, then let's just wait to be buried.
View OriginalReply0
mev_me_maybe
· 01-11 02:27
184%? Haha, I'm dying laughing. Google and Meta are now the market's reassurance. Honestly, it's still endless AI hype, isn't it?
Will the next cycle really continue to soar? I'm a bit doubtful... I feel like this wave of increase has already exhausted expectations.
View OriginalReply0
SmartContractDiver
· 01-09 21:07
184% this number is really impressive, but brother, I want to say... how much of this increase is driven by genuine demand, and how much is purely capital rotation with nowhere else to go?
FOMO among retail investors is the biggest driving force; don't be fooled by grand narratives.
View OriginalReply0
GasGoblin
· 01-08 08:29
Wow, Alphabet and Meta's recent surge is really outrageous... 184% in three years. How many people have jumped on and off along the way?
View OriginalReply0
SatsStacking
· 01-08 08:28
NGL 184% sounds great, but is this surge just pure hype? After all the AI concept hype for so long, can the actual cash flow keep up...
---
Back in the dot-com days, they also talked about "infrastructure," but look what happened—still collapsed... Is this time really different?
---
So basically, all the money is pouring into tech giants, while other asset classes are being drained... When will this cycle break?
---
Wait, are portfolio strategists now betting that the next cycle will also be tech-driven? Feels a bit too concentrated.
---
184% over three years... If this is a signal, then the market is concentrated in the hands of a few players. What about the risk? Does anyone care?
---
Infrastructure players... This term is really well-packaged, but it's basically just data monopoly.
---
Looking at this logic, as long as AI remains a hot topic, money will keep flowing here... If I didn't think there was still potential, I wouldn't believe it could last this long.
View OriginalReply0
MoneyBurner
· 01-08 08:27
184% is it? I've been lurking long ago. Now it's just a matter of whether on-chain data will give the next buy signal... Don't tell me about value investing; I only believe in the wind of opportunity and liquidity premiums.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityHunter
· 01-08 08:25
What? 184%... These two giants are really not joking, it feels like all the money is pouring into technology.
---
Something's off. Is this rebound driven by genuine demand or just pure gambling mentality? It doesn't seem that simple.
---
The term "infrastructure" sounds good, but are they really daring to go all in next? Feeling a bit anxious.
---
All-time highs have been broken, and now I'm a bit scared... This is usually the most dangerous time.
---
Wait, what are they hinting at? Is the next cycle's money really still in tech stocks?
---
184% in three years, this growth rate is indeed top-notch, but what about the risks? Who can say for sure?
---
This is just a sign that money is looking for an exit, no other explanation.
View OriginalReply0
gas_guzzler
· 01-08 08:24
184%? Bro, this wave of gains is indeed explosive, but I still feel there's a bit too much bubble in this rebound...
---
The logic behind the big players turning around this time is actually just one sentence—AI concepts can still be hyped, and funds have nowhere else to go.
---
Wait, have the all-time highs been broken? Is there really that much room for growth in the next cycle? I’m skeptical.
---
The positioning of infrastructure players is still pretty ridiculous; frankly, it’s still betting on the future, no different from the internet bubble back in the day.
---
184% over three years... that’s an annualized return of just over 50%. In the crypto world, that’s really nothing.
---
Feels like we’re back in a frenzy, and the next crash could be even more intense than the last.
---
Portfolio strategists are probably frantically adjusting their positions now, afraid of missing out. That mindset itself is a risk signal.
---
If you ask me, the real test is whether this rally can hold. Taking profits early and securing gains is a healthier attitude.
View OriginalReply0
JustHereForAirdrops
· 01-08 08:10
184% three years? That number is scary... feels like a correction is coming
---
The rebound of big tech, honestly, is still AI hype holding up the market
---
Wait, is this why recent airdrop projects all want to ride the big company concept?
---
NGL infrastructure stocks should indeed rise, but this speed is really outrageous... how to play it later
---
Is it time to run again? It’s always like this
---
Meta and Alphabet are rebounding wildly, but can they really sustain? I’m skeptical
---
So the next cycle’s money will flow into tech, which is really uncomfortable
---
184%... what kind of divine trend is this, why didn’t I catch up?
---
Funds are gathering into big tech, does this mean smaller coins are even less active?
---
Infrastructure revival? Or bubble 2.0? Looks intimidating
In just three years, Alphabet and Meta have shattered records that haven't been touched since the dot-com era—posting a combined 184% sector rally. This isn't just a stock market blip. It's a fundamental shift in how capital flows through the market.
What makes this notable? These aren't speculative startups anymore. They're the infrastructure players of the digital age, and their recovery past historical peaks suggests something deeper about market psychology and investor confidence in tech-driven growth.
For anyone tracking macro trends, this matters. When traditional tech heavyweights start outperforming legacy records, it often signals broader cycles in risk appetite, capital allocation, and how investors reassess value across asset classes.
The question becomes: where does this momentum go next? And more importantly for portfolio strategists—what does a 184% three-year rally tell us about where the market thinks returns come from in the next cycle?