Recently, many people have been emphasizing the importance of learning AI, but here is a key question—how reliable are the answers provided by AI?
This is exactly what I have been paying attention to. There is a project called Mira, which specializes in this: having AI review and verify each other. The idea is quite interesting; the core logic is to break down AI answers into verifiable facts and then check each one for accuracy.
I started following them even before the project issued tokens, and the reason is simple—they are doing something truly different. It’s not just about simple tool-level optimization, but about addressing the fundamental issue of AI credibility. Such an approach is still rare in Web3.
Rather than blindly trusting AI, it’s better to have a system with self-correcting capabilities. That’s true progress.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
22 Likes
Reward
22
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
CommunityLurker
· 01-10 06:50
It's just AI fighting each other to verify, huh? That's pretty interesting.
---
Mira's approach is indeed innovative, but the real question is whether it can be practically implemented.
---
Early on, everyone involved in the project made profits; now it's just a matter of whether they can come up with new tricks.
---
The underlying verification capability is indeed a bottleneck, I agree.
---
Instead of waiting for the official regulations, it's better for the market to evolve on its own. That's how Web3 should be played.
---
Breaking down into verifiable facts is a crucial step; otherwise, it's just a false appearance.
---
No token issuance, yet jumping in—really bold.
---
The trustworthiness of AI will be solved sooner or later; Mira opening this loophole is still valuable.
---
A system with strong self-correction ability can survive longer; this logic is sound.
View OriginalReply0
DeFi_Dad_Jokes
· 01-09 16:22
Alright, now that's what I call identifying the real problem. I believe in the logic of AI mutual verification; it's much better than those superficial optimizations.
View OriginalReply0
CountdownToBroke
· 01-08 07:58
I've already said it, you can't trust that AI set of answers, Mira's approach is indeed innovative.
View OriginalReply0
MEV_Whisperer
· 01-08 07:56
Bullshit, half of the AI-generated content is hallucination. The idea of Mira is indeed effective, but the problem is, who will review and audit the AI?
View OriginalReply0
FarmHopper
· 01-08 07:52
Bullshit, AI is just making things up now. Mira's approach is actually fresh.
Someone really has been eyeing this area for a while. Addressing the root problems is the way to go.
Recently, many people have been emphasizing the importance of learning AI, but here is a key question—how reliable are the answers provided by AI?
This is exactly what I have been paying attention to. There is a project called Mira, which specializes in this: having AI review and verify each other. The idea is quite interesting; the core logic is to break down AI answers into verifiable facts and then check each one for accuracy.
I started following them even before the project issued tokens, and the reason is simple—they are doing something truly different. It’s not just about simple tool-level optimization, but about addressing the fundamental issue of AI credibility. Such an approach is still rare in Web3.
Rather than blindly trusting AI, it’s better to have a system with self-correcting capabilities. That’s true progress.