Recently, there has been an interesting phenomenon—early 2026, Bitcoin saw over $1.2 billion in new funds flowing in, yet the price kept oscillating between $87,000 and $90,000, without any clear breakthrough.
Many people are puzzled: money is coming in, so why is the price still like this? Actually, the underlying logic is as follows. When a large amount of funds buy Bitcoin through spot ETFs, institutional investors and trading firms will simultaneously sell in the futures or options markets to hedge risk—that is, they are receiving new funds on one hand, while quietly shorting to balance their positions.
As a result, the ETF buying pressure is offset by the institutional selling. On the surface, it looks like the market has ample funds, but what truly drives the price is the net demand after this increase and decrease. Therefore, to judge Bitcoin's future trend, one should not only look at the scale of capital inflows but also consider how strong the actual market demand is after deducting hedging trades.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
22 Likes
Reward
22
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
WhaleWatcher
· 01-11 06:32
Haha, institutions playing this hedging game, retail investors can never figure it out.
View OriginalReply0
tokenomics_truther
· 01-11 03:25
Damn, are the institutions playing this trick again? Poisoning while having dinner—it's truly impressive.
View OriginalReply0
AlwaysAnon
· 01-09 23:45
This institutional hedging strategy is really brilliant; on the surface, funds seem to be coming in, but in reality, they are all being absorbed.
View OriginalReply0
PriceOracleFairy
· 01-08 07:51
ngl, the hedge games institutions play are genuinely sick... $1.2B flowing in but price just sits there like some broken pump 💀 net demand is the real tea, not the gross inflows everyone flexes about
Reply0
ShamedApeSeller
· 01-08 07:51
Haha, laughing to death. Institutions are eating their cakes while shorting, retail investors are still foolishly watching the capital inflow. This show is quite spectacular.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoHistoryClass
· 01-08 07:45
ah yes, the classic "money printer goes brrr but price stays flat" paradox. statistically speaking, this is exactly how 2017 whale accumulation looked on the charts before the explosive move. those ETF flows masking the real net demand? *checks notes* we literally saw this playbook in 2021 with the futures market games. history doesn't repeat, but it sure does rhyme with uncanny precision.
Reply0
TerraNeverForget
· 01-08 07:36
Damn, institutions are really clever. They secretly short while siphoning our money, and we still have to pay for their hedging.
View OriginalReply0
GweiWatcher
· 01-08 07:31
Institutions are playing tricks again, buying with the left hand and selling with the right hand. Net demand is the real thing. See through it.
Recently, there has been an interesting phenomenon—early 2026, Bitcoin saw over $1.2 billion in new funds flowing in, yet the price kept oscillating between $87,000 and $90,000, without any clear breakthrough.
Many people are puzzled: money is coming in, so why is the price still like this? Actually, the underlying logic is as follows. When a large amount of funds buy Bitcoin through spot ETFs, institutional investors and trading firms will simultaneously sell in the futures or options markets to hedge risk—that is, they are receiving new funds on one hand, while quietly shorting to balance their positions.
As a result, the ETF buying pressure is offset by the institutional selling. On the surface, it looks like the market has ample funds, but what truly drives the price is the net demand after this increase and decrease. Therefore, to judge Bitcoin's future trend, one should not only look at the scale of capital inflows but also consider how strong the actual market demand is after deducting hedging trades.