2026-01-08 07:20:56

YoRuHub's development repository indeed looks impressive, with a solid level of codebase richness and update frequency. However, from a token perspective, has the project team considered giving this token more practical use cases?

Nowadays, many Web3 projects tend to fall into a strange cycle: strong development capabilities and good infrastructure, but the token itself has somewhat become a fundraising tool. Is there a way to see the real value flow of the token within the ecosystem—such as governance rights, fee sharing, or the design of ecosystem incentive mechanisms?

It seems that for a project with such strong development strength, the accompanying tokenomics design should keep pace to truly form a competitive ecosystem moat.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

16 Likes

Reward
16
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

BearHugger

· 01-11 07:20

The codebase can indeed be built, but what about token economics? Is it just the same fundraising套路?

View OriginalReply0

MeaninglessGwei

· 01-11 02:36

The code is good, but the token economics part is really just air. How to break through?

View OriginalReply0

WhaleMinion

· 01-10 17:34

The code is solid, but the token economy is really a weakness. Why do so many projects stumble here? Is the token just a fundraising tool? Then it's not really an ecosystem, it's hilarious. Just waiting to see how YoRuHub handles the fee sharing part. Hopefully it's not just a promise on paper.

View OriginalReply0

ser_aped.eth

· 01-08 07:51

The code is indeed solid, but when it comes to token economics... it still feels like just talking about it, right? It really needs to be implemented.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidityHunter

· 01-08 07:47

The code definitely works, but the token economics really need to be improved; otherwise, it's just a pretty shell.

View OriginalReply0

ThatsNotARugPull

· 01-08 07:46

The code is awesome, but the token economics are really disappointing. Feels like it's just another gimmick.

View OriginalReply0

ChainDoctor

· 01-08 07:37

No matter how beautiful the code stack is, it's useless. When the token economics are pulled, it's still just an empty shell. This is the current phenomenon.

View OriginalReply0

DeFiDoctor

· 01-08 07:21

The medical record shows that this project code quality is indeed good, but the token economics... clinical performance is concerning. The financing tool nature is too strong, and the real value circulation is almost zero. It is recommended to regularly review aspects like fee sharing and governance rights, otherwise the symptoms of capital outflow will eventually appear. Combining strong fundamentals with a flawed token design is a common problem in the DeFi space.

View OriginalReply0