Whether the broker track is a pseudo-demand or a real demand isn't that important. What's key? The user base. As long as there are enough users and the market recognition is high enough, the inherent flaws of the form itself are not an issue. Based on this logic, I still lean towards betting on this field—treating it as a probability game. After all, opportunities in trading markets are often like this: it doesn't matter if the theory is perfect; what matters is whether you can seize the opportunity.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
21 Likes
Reward
21
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
DustCollector
· 01-10 18:43
Basically, it's just gambling on more people, no matter how perfect the theory is.
View OriginalReply0
SocialAnxietyStaker
· 01-10 11:12
Well said, it's just about betting on popularity. Whether the theory is perfect or not doesn't matter, as long as it can harvest the little guys, haha.
View OriginalReply0
DeFiDoctor
· 01-08 07:46
Can a large user base hide flaws? I've heard this kind of talk in over a dozen collapsed projects... The clinical manifestation is that protocols that rush for volume early on often die at the moment of liquidity exhaustion.
View OriginalReply0
NoodlesOrTokens
· 01-08 07:30
Basically, it's about betting on user volume. I understand this logic.
View OriginalReply0
NFT_Therapy_Group
· 01-08 07:28
Basically, it's just about betting on popularity. Anyway, that's how the Web3 scene is.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseMigrant
· 01-08 07:28
Basically, it's just betting on popularity. The perfection of the theory is no longer important.
View OriginalReply0
HallucinationGrower
· 01-08 07:22
That's right, it's all about gambling user base anyway. Who cares if there's real demand?
View OriginalReply0
LonelyAnchorman
· 01-08 07:21
Basically, it's just gambling on how many people participate; whether it's a real demand or a fake demand doesn't matter.
Whether the broker track is a pseudo-demand or a real demand isn't that important. What's key? The user base. As long as there are enough users and the market recognition is high enough, the inherent flaws of the form itself are not an issue. Based on this logic, I still lean towards betting on this field—treating it as a probability game. After all, opportunities in trading markets are often like this: it doesn't matter if the theory is perfect; what matters is whether you can seize the opportunity.