Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
#量子计算威胁 Does quantum computing threaten Bitcoin? This wave of public opinion is really quite interesting. On one side, Nic Carter says that 1.7 million Bitcoins are at risk, while on the other side, Bitcoin Core developer Jameson Lopp directly dismisses the urgency—there's no need to panic in the short term, and any protocol changes would take at least 5 to 10 years.
I looked into the details and feel that this matter isn't as urgent as it seems on the surface. Quantum computing is indeed a potential threat, but it's still in the "theoretically feasible" stage, and cracking the Bitcoin network is still a long way off. The funniest part is that someone pointed out that the fund backing Nic Carter has invested in a quantum-resistant tool company—this is very representative, creating anxiety on one hand and making money on the other.
But Lopp is also right; we should be prepared just in case. If an upgrade is really needed, it will be a major event involving the entire system—fund migration, consensus modifications, all of which are significant. So now is the time to start preparing plans, but there's no need to be scared right now.
Such things are common in the crypto world—when a hot topic emerges, various players act according to their interests, and the truth is often drowned out by information noise. What we, the onlookers, should do is listen to multiple perspectives and not let a single viewpoint hijack our thinking.