Have you ever thought about a question: if an intelligent contract consumes false data, can the output still be the true result? It sounds like a brain teaser, but it is becoming the most critical weakness in the entire blockchain industry. Everyone is competing on TPS and building ecosystems, but few truly care about this fundamental issue—how to synchronize blockchain with the real world without being polluted by false information.



Blockchains are inherently "data blind." Stock prices, weather changes, logistics progress—these off-chain information are all unfamiliar to it. Traditional oracles try to act as this "messenger," but the problem is obvious: relying on a single data source is like giving all your house keys to a gatekeeper; if he becomes unreliable one day, the entire system collapses.

There is a different approach taken by a oracle network called APRO. It does not rely on a single authority but instead sets up a "data jury." It gathers information from dozens of independent data sources, verified through decentralized nodes, and finally makes a judgment using an AI risk control model. Only data that passes unanimously can be recorded on-chain—not just transferring information, but truly arbitrating facts.

Even more interesting is APRO's dual usage mode. Developers gain the first level of choice. In real-time push mode, market quotes, competition results, and trading signals can be actively pushed onto the chain within milliseconds, allowing DeFi liquidations and high-frequency trading to no longer worry about data delays causing unexpected losses. The on-demand pull mode is the opposite, calling data only when needed, saving costs on idle bandwidth. It’s like using water and electricity—pay as you go. Scenarios like insurance claims and property valuation can finally keep up with actual application needs.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
LiquiditySurfervip
· 7h ago
Garbage in, garbage out. Isn't that common sense? Someone has already said that a long time ago, and yet APRO still has to teach us.
View OriginalReply0
LightningHarvestervip
· 7h ago
Garbage in, garbage out. That's true... but can the APRO jury system really solve it? It still seems to depend on whether the nodes will collude.
View OriginalReply0
ForkThisDAOvip
· 7h ago
Oh wow, finally someone dares to say this heartbreaking thing. Data garbage goes in, and you still expect gold to come out? Dream on.
View OriginalReply0
ImpermanentPhilosophervip
· 7h ago
That's the real problem: garbage in, garbage out. No matter how strong the chain is, it can't be saved.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityWizardvip
· 7h ago
The concept of a data jury is okay, but honestly, no matter how many nodes verify, it can't prevent everyone from colluding to do evil... I'm just worried that one day, if the ecosystem grows big and the利益链条 gets involved, all the decentralization efforts will be pointless.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)