Imagine that smart contracts are like 24/7 online traders, whose decisions depend entirely on external data—price information, market conditions, settlement results. But what happens if this data channel is unreliable, sometimes delivering incorrect prices, other times delayed by half a day? The consequences could be disastrous: DeFi applications might execute wrong trades, NFT dynamic attributes could freeze, insurance claim processes could grind to a halt. This is the deepest hidden pain point in today’s blockchain world: **the reliability and real-time nature of data far lag behind the ambitions of on-chain applications**.
The problem with traditional oracles is quite obvious. Most solutions resemble a single IV drip—single data source, fixed pathway. If it gets attacked, polluted, or network congestion occurs, the entire application ecosystem relying on it could become paralyzed. Risk is concentrated at one point, which is fatal for the entire ecosystem.
APRO attempts to fundamentally redesign this system. The core idea is to establish a "Distributed Data Processing Hub." How exactly does it work?
**Multi-source Collection**: Simultaneously pull data from dozens of independent, verified sources, rather than relying on a single source. This way, even if one source fails, the entire system remains resilient.
**Node Layer Filtering**: Raw data collected enters a decentralized network of nodes, which perform cross-validation and consensus mechanisms to ensure data authenticity.
**AI Real-time Monitoring**: Machine learning models continuously run to identify and isolate anomalies and polluted data, performing quality control like doctors examining blood.
However, such a solution also faces a practical challenge: **Different scenarios have vastly different data requirements**. Some applications demand ultra-fast responses, while others are cost-sensitive.
APRO’s answer is to provide two channels—
**Push Mode** (Real-time Priority): For information like price changes or match scores, the system actively monitors and immediately pushes data onto the chain once a change is detected. This is most friendly to DeFi trading platforms, eliminating worries about data delays causing losses.
**Pull Mode** (On-demand Payment): Applications only request data when truly needed, incurring no costs during idle periods. This mode is ideal for low-frequency operations like insurance claims or asset valuation.
In simple terms, developers can flexibly control data supply by adjusting the "water tap," choosing the appropriate data delivery method based on actual business needs. This is not just a technical upgrade but a fundamental solution to the problem of "insufficient blood supply" of data for on-chain applications.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
AirdropChaser
· 9h ago
Oracles have long been an issue that needed to be solved. Single points of failure can really kill the entire ecosystem, no joke. Multi-source redundancy isn't a new idea, but few implementations are truly practical. APRO's approach seems interesting. The push-pull dual-track system is indeed flexible, but it's unclear how much the cost can be reduced. Those so-called low-cost solutions on the market ultimately aren't that cheap.
View OriginalReply0
StakeWhisperer
· 9h ago
Oracles are indeed a major challenge; single point failures are too terrifying... Multi-source collection sounds reliable, but I'm worried that the actual implementation might be another story.
View OriginalReply0
WalletDivorcer
· 9h ago
The oracle problem is indeed a big headache, but this dual-channel solution sounds a bit too idealistic... Multi-source data collection sounds good, but I'm worried about who will maintain the nodes at the node layer, and who will bear the costs.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-beba108d
· 9h ago
Oracles are indeed a longstanding challenge; single points of failure can easily cause issues.
View OriginalReply0
SchroedingersFrontrun
· 9h ago
Oracles are indeed a longstanding challenge; a single point of failure can cause everything to collapse. The multi-source collection approach of APRO finally has some interesting ideas.
View OriginalReply0
TestnetNomad
· 9h ago
Hey, the oracle problem is indeed a tough nut to crack; relying on a single data source makes it too easy to be compromised.
Imagine that smart contracts are like 24/7 online traders, whose decisions depend entirely on external data—price information, market conditions, settlement results. But what happens if this data channel is unreliable, sometimes delivering incorrect prices, other times delayed by half a day? The consequences could be disastrous: DeFi applications might execute wrong trades, NFT dynamic attributes could freeze, insurance claim processes could grind to a halt. This is the deepest hidden pain point in today’s blockchain world: **the reliability and real-time nature of data far lag behind the ambitions of on-chain applications**.
The problem with traditional oracles is quite obvious. Most solutions resemble a single IV drip—single data source, fixed pathway. If it gets attacked, polluted, or network congestion occurs, the entire application ecosystem relying on it could become paralyzed. Risk is concentrated at one point, which is fatal for the entire ecosystem.
APRO attempts to fundamentally redesign this system. The core idea is to establish a "Distributed Data Processing Hub." How exactly does it work?
**Multi-source Collection**: Simultaneously pull data from dozens of independent, verified sources, rather than relying on a single source. This way, even if one source fails, the entire system remains resilient.
**Node Layer Filtering**: Raw data collected enters a decentralized network of nodes, which perform cross-validation and consensus mechanisms to ensure data authenticity.
**AI Real-time Monitoring**: Machine learning models continuously run to identify and isolate anomalies and polluted data, performing quality control like doctors examining blood.
However, such a solution also faces a practical challenge: **Different scenarios have vastly different data requirements**. Some applications demand ultra-fast responses, while others are cost-sensitive.
APRO’s answer is to provide two channels—
**Push Mode** (Real-time Priority): For information like price changes or match scores, the system actively monitors and immediately pushes data onto the chain once a change is detected. This is most friendly to DeFi trading platforms, eliminating worries about data delays causing losses.
**Pull Mode** (On-demand Payment): Applications only request data when truly needed, incurring no costs during idle periods. This mode is ideal for low-frequency operations like insurance claims or asset valuation.
In simple terms, developers can flexibly control data supply by adjusting the "water tap," choosing the appropriate data delivery method based on actual business needs. This is not just a technical upgrade but a fundamental solution to the problem of "insufficient blood supply" of data for on-chain applications.