Recently, players participating in trading competitions should have felt it— the difficulty and cost of ranking are continuously increasing.
Taking the latest Kgen project as an example, the leaderboard size is about 350,000. Calculated with a typical slippage loss of 2 per 10,000, the theoretical cost is around 70 USDT. But the actual situation is much more complicated.
Where is the problem? The project team and market makers are working more closely together. A large number of bots repeatedly trade within trading pairs, creating fake liquidity, which is actually setting a trap for ordinary traders. You think you're just doing order刷, but in fact, you're being squeezed. I personally spent 370,000 on this round, and ultimately lost about 110 USDT. It sounds like a lot, but the reward is only 50 USDT, resulting in a net loss of 60 USDT.
The key issue is: the points gained from this trading competition are about 12 points higher than stablecoin mining (6.6WU). These points are not enough to participate in airdrops, which typically have a value of around 30-40 USDT for mainstream projects.
The math is simple: - Trading competition route: 110 USDT cost - 50 USDT reward = 60 USDT loss, and you might still not rank high - Stablecoin route: stable returns, zero additional cost
Someone might ask, is it still worth participating in trading competitions? If you're an expert and can keep the loss within thousands or even achieve positive returns, it's definitely worth trying. But most ordinary players have losses around 0.3%, and in this case, stacking stablecoins is clearly more cost-effective.
The biggest risk in trading competitions now is being robbed of your ranking— once your position drops, it's a double blow. Don't be fooled by the small rewards of a few tens of USDT; after careful calculation, you'll realize that the era of trading competitions might really be over.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
AltcoinTherapist
· 8h ago
$370,000 invested with a loss of $60,000, I can't understand this math problem haha
---
Honestly, trading competitions are now just robots harvesting, retail investors have no chance at all
---
Staking stablecoins is really awesome, earning passively is it not great? Why are we still being squeezed?
---
The moment your tower gets stolen is probably when your mentality collapses, it’s so painful
---
No wonder more and more people are complaining on forums lately, turns out they’re all being cut
---
A 3% loss is already the bottom line, why keep throwing money in then?
---
The project team and market makers colluding has been obvious for a long time, are we to blame for being naive?
---
Throwing away 110u for a 50u reward, isn’t that just paying tuition?
View OriginalReply0
GasWrangler
· 8h ago
Just look at the data, don't be fooled by false liquidity. If you can't keep slippage within the thousandth place, stacking stablecoins actually has a lower gas cost... The mechanism design of the trading race itself is sub-optimal, mathematically speaking.
View OriginalReply0
MultiSigFailMaster
· 8h ago
Oh no, this math problem really made me lose a lot of money, no wonder I've seen so many people turning to stablecoins recently.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropNinja
· 8h ago
370,000 cost loss down to $110, and only made $50? What kind of math is this? I would just choose stablecoins directly.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationOracle
· 8h ago
Damn, 370,000 yuan turned into a loss of 110 USDT. Who the hell would still do this trade? Purely being squeezed to death by robots.
It’s clear that the project team and market makers are on the same team. Ordinary players just want to make the list. Honestly, it’s just about making money.
Stacking stablecoins to earn 6.6 WU interest isn’t tempting enough? You have to mess with this mystical slippage.
If your ranking drops, it’s a 60 USDT loss, just a drop in the bucket. What’s the point?
Only high-level experts are worth playing. We amateurs might as well forget it.
Recently, players participating in trading competitions should have felt it— the difficulty and cost of ranking are continuously increasing.
Taking the latest Kgen project as an example, the leaderboard size is about 350,000. Calculated with a typical slippage loss of 2 per 10,000, the theoretical cost is around 70 USDT. But the actual situation is much more complicated.
Where is the problem? The project team and market makers are working more closely together. A large number of bots repeatedly trade within trading pairs, creating fake liquidity, which is actually setting a trap for ordinary traders. You think you're just doing order刷, but in fact, you're being squeezed. I personally spent 370,000 on this round, and ultimately lost about 110 USDT. It sounds like a lot, but the reward is only 50 USDT, resulting in a net loss of 60 USDT.
The key issue is: the points gained from this trading competition are about 12 points higher than stablecoin mining (6.6WU). These points are not enough to participate in airdrops, which typically have a value of around 30-40 USDT for mainstream projects.
The math is simple:
- Trading competition route: 110 USDT cost - 50 USDT reward = 60 USDT loss, and you might still not rank high
- Stablecoin route: stable returns, zero additional cost
Someone might ask, is it still worth participating in trading competitions? If you're an expert and can keep the loss within thousands or even achieve positive returns, it's definitely worth trying. But most ordinary players have losses around 0.3%, and in this case, stacking stablecoins is clearly more cost-effective.
The biggest risk in trading competitions now is being robbed of your ranking— once your position drops, it's a double blow. Don't be fooled by the small rewards of a few tens of USDT; after careful calculation, you'll realize that the era of trading competitions might really be over.