Early in the morning, while checking on-chain data, I jumped up from my chair—another ETH whale has started the "buying and locking" mode. Overnight, this address deposited 118,000 ETH (equivalent to $350 million) into a staking contract, bringing the total locked amount to nearly $1.37 billion. This is no longer just simple "HODLing"; essentially, it's eating up ETH's on-chain liquidity.
As someone who has been involved in the crypto market for many years, I believe the subsequent impact of this move could be much more profound than expected. Let's clarify the reasoning.
The logic behind ETH staking is quite straightforward: lock tokens in a consensus layer contract, participate in network validation, and earn rewards. The key point is that unlocking requires waiting for a specific period, effectively "freezing" circulating ETH. Usually, decentralized staking is a healthy sign for the ecosystem, but when whales concentrate their actions, it’s a different story.
According to on-chain data tracking, this whale has been frequently increasing its holdings since last month and has now become the fifth-largest staking address on the network. Its staked ETH accounts for 0.8% of the total circulating supply. It may not seem like much, right? But the problem is that the current ETH staking rate is only 18.2%. Concentrated staking by a single address will directly reduce tradable chips in the secondary market, ultimately leading to a "liquidity drought."
Some might say, "Less chips are a good thing, right? Scarcity drives up ETH prices." I have to pour cold water on that—while this may have a short-term effect, the long-term health of the on-chain ecosystem will be genuinely impacted.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SchrodingersFOMO
· 8h ago
It's the same old trick again. Whale lock-ups are like smoke screens; they pump the price up in the short term but ruin the ecosystem in the long run.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropFreedom
· 8h ago
Another big whale is eating liquidity. I'm just wondering, is our 18.2% staking rate really healthy?
View OriginalReply0
HappyToBeDumped
· 8h ago
Seeing this news at 3 a.m. literally blew my mind—$350 million locked overnight. This is really not a game.
View OriginalReply0
WhaleWatcher
· 9h ago
This move is indeed aggressive, but I'm more worried that more and more followers will jump in later, and ETH liquidity could really get stuck and deadlocked.
Early in the morning, while checking on-chain data, I jumped up from my chair—another ETH whale has started the "buying and locking" mode. Overnight, this address deposited 118,000 ETH (equivalent to $350 million) into a staking contract, bringing the total locked amount to nearly $1.37 billion. This is no longer just simple "HODLing"; essentially, it's eating up ETH's on-chain liquidity.
As someone who has been involved in the crypto market for many years, I believe the subsequent impact of this move could be much more profound than expected. Let's clarify the reasoning.
The logic behind ETH staking is quite straightforward: lock tokens in a consensus layer contract, participate in network validation, and earn rewards. The key point is that unlocking requires waiting for a specific period, effectively "freezing" circulating ETH. Usually, decentralized staking is a healthy sign for the ecosystem, but when whales concentrate their actions, it’s a different story.
According to on-chain data tracking, this whale has been frequently increasing its holdings since last month and has now become the fifth-largest staking address on the network. Its staked ETH accounts for 0.8% of the total circulating supply. It may not seem like much, right? But the problem is that the current ETH staking rate is only 18.2%. Concentrated staking by a single address will directly reduce tradable chips in the secondary market, ultimately leading to a "liquidity drought."
Some might say, "Less chips are a good thing, right? Scarcity drives up ETH prices." I have to pour cold water on that—while this may have a short-term effect, the long-term health of the on-chain ecosystem will be genuinely impacted.