There is an unavoidable challenge in blockchain: no matter how secure the ledger is, it cannot access off-chain data. Price fluctuations, sports event results, weather information, logistics progress... these real-world data points are completely inaccessible to smart contracts. The existence of this information silo limits the imagination space for blockchain applications.



How did the old generation of oracles operate? Basically, they acted like messengers, going to find information and then relaying it to you. The problem is obvious—relying on a single data source makes it vulnerable to attacks and bribery. Once compromised, the entire system becomes a factory of lies.

APRO's approach is entirely different. It no longer depends on a single messenger but instead builds a "decentralized data council." How to understand this? Multiple independent data source nodes simultaneously collect information, then verify it through distributed voting, and finally, AI models monitor anomalies and manipulation behaviors in real-time. Data is not simply transported; it undergoes a rigorous "public trial."

This system introduces two usage modes, each with its own advantages.

**Real-time Push Mode** is suitable for scenarios with zero tolerance for latency. Market prices, event results, trading signals—any change can be instantly synchronized to the chain. Time-sensitive operations like DeFi liquidations and high-frequency trading no longer need to worry about "unexpected losses" caused by data delays.

**On-demand Pull Mode** aims to reduce costs. Applications only call data when needed, avoiding idle traffic fees. Low-frequency scenarios like insurance claim verification and property valuation can cut costs by half directly.

Developers can now truly balance "timeliness" and "economics" for the first time, flexibly choosing based on business needs, without being forced into compromises. This is what an oracle should look like.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
NFTArchaeologisvip
· 8h ago
It's so strange. Oracles evolving from "single messengers" to "parliamentary systems" feel a bit like the evolution of ancient information transmission—from relay stations to postal networks.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCryingvip
· 8h ago
It's the story of oracles again. Have they truly solved the single point of failure this time? But honestly, decentralized data councils sound good, just worried it's the same old wine in a new bottle. Can real-time push notifications save DeFi liquidations, or will they still be front-run? On-demand pulling to save money? Let's see if Gas fees will rise again first. If APRO can really operate in both modes, then it's a win, but for now, let's wait and see. Having more developer choices is indeed good, but the key still depends on whether the data sources themselves are reliable. Will this AI-based anomaly detection logic be manipulated in reverse? Honestly, it's still a trust issue—same old story with a different flavor?
View OriginalReply0
BasementAlchemistvip
· 8h ago
The decentralized data council sounds good, but once it goes on the chain, it might be a whole different story...
View OriginalReply0
BrokeBeansvip
· 8h ago
Decentralized Data Council sounds awesome, but I don't know how the costs are calculated. Could it be another scam?
View OriginalReply0
WalletDoomsDayvip
· 8h ago
Decentralized Data Council sounds good, but how can we ensure that AI itself isn't compromised when monitoring manipulative behaviors?
View OriginalReply0
NFTDreamervip
· 9h ago
Finally, someone has explained the long-standing problem of oracles clearly. The single messenger approach should have been phased out long ago. Decentralized voting verification + AI monitoring sounds reliable, but I wonder if the costs can really be cut in half. The ability to switch freely between the two modes is indeed attractive. In DeFi liquidation, latency is the biggest concern. It's easy to say, but it mainly depends on how well APRO's AI anomaly detection works. Hopefully, it doesn't become a new single point of failure. Does on-demand pulling really save money? Or is it just another way to harvest users? Are there any real-world test data?
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)