The biggest fear for DEX users is the sandwich attack—before your transaction is even completed, malicious actors buy in first to push up the price, then sell after you complete your trade to siphon off the profit. In just a few blocks, the gains are wiped out.



Why are traditional AMMs so easily targeted? Simply put, your transaction intent is fully transparent in the public mempool, and miners and validators hold the final say in transaction ordering. Searchers only need to monitor this information to easily construct sandwich trades and profit from them. The fairness of trading is so fragile that a single poke can break it in the face of profit temptation.

Some new-generation DEXs are starting to fundamentally solve this problem. They use privacy pools, fair ordering mechanisms, and other methods to prevent searchers from peeking into transaction information in advance, cutting off attack chains at the source. This is not just minor tweaks but a complete redesign of the entire trading logic.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
YieldWhisperervip
· 15h ago
The sandwich attack is really a variant of rug pulls; public mempools are just a honeypot for bots. I need to think more about the logic of the new DEX privacy pools. Feels like it's more moderate compared to MEV? This is the kind of innovation that should exist, not those flashy ecosystem tokens.
View OriginalReply0
ForkYouPayMevip
· 15h ago
Sandwich attacks are really outrageous, feels like I'm being drained every day --- That's why I only use privacy pools on DEXs now; traditional AMMs are too easy to sniper --- Exactly, the transparent design of memory pools should have been changed long ago, it's really annoying --- The privacy mechanisms of the new generation DEXs are indeed powerful, finally someone has fundamentally solved this problem --- Searchers are parasites; this kind of fair order mechanism must be promoted --- The moment miners control transaction order, it determines the tragedy for ordinary users... --- With so many issues in AMMs, no wonder everyone is fleeing --- Privacy pools sound good, does anyone know which DEX does it best? --- Only a complete redesign can save this ecosystem; small patches are useless
View OriginalReply0
gas_fee_therapyvip
· 15h ago
The sandwich attack is really impressive, feels like I'm working for the miners. I've been sniped more than once, and now that mempool transparency is a thing, I'm truly convinced. The logic behind this new DEX privacy pool sounds pretty good, but I wonder if new bugs will pop up again. Someone should have ended AMM long ago, it's so annoying. Speaking of which, it still relies on privacy mechanisms, but can we really trust this stuff?
View OriginalReply0
FromMinerToFarmervip
· 15h ago
Haha really, every time I swap I feel like I've been played, I thought it was just slippage, but it turns out these guys are making a profit in the middle. Privacy pools are indeed attractive, but I wonder if they'll come up with some new tricks again. This is the way a DEX should be; other platforms are still relying on old methods. During the miner era, I never thought there would be so many twists and turns behind transactions. Now that I've become a farmer, I see things more clearly. Fair ordering is really important; otherwise, no matter how much liquidity or how low the fees, it's all pointless.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • بالعربية
  • Português (Brasil)
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Español
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Русский
  • 繁體中文
  • Українська
  • Tiếng Việt